A former Gizmodo writer changed his name to ‘Slackbot’ and stayed undetected for months::Former Gizmodo writer Tom McKay managed to stay in the company’s workplace Slack even after leaving. All he had to do was change his name to “Slackbot.”

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Gizmodo was bought out by a bucket of shitheads that clearly dont have their IT sorted, so it sounds like he did this out of a sense of mischief and curiosity.

      It’s a fun IT story he got on leaving a bad org. Sounds like a win for a tech writer.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reminds me of the time I found a professor’s lanyard (not the ID) in college and would just wave it around. Half the time, security shrugged and let me through without scanning my ID.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    That’s what IT Brew’s Tom McKay did when he left Gizmodo in 2022, and he went undetected by the site’s management for months.

    If you’re not glued to Slack for most of the day like I am, then you might not know that Slackbot is the friendly robot that lives in the messaging service.

    It helps you do things like set reminders, find out your office’s Wi-Fi password, or let you know when you’ve been mentioned in a channel that you’re not a part of.

    When it was his time to leave, McKay swapped out his existing profile picture for one that resembled an angrier version of Slackbot’s actual icon.

    Have a Slack-ly day!” My colleague Victoria Song, who previously worked at Gizmodo, isn’t all that surprised that this situation unfolded, and says, “As Tom’s former coworker and a G/O Media survivor, this tracks.”

    Of course, not every company will fall for this trick, as some have security measures in place to prevent this kind of thing.


    The original article contains 343 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 51%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!