• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    or paid Google lickspittle

    Almost zero chance it’s that. They don’t need to pay people to do it when they know people are more than willing to do it for free due to a lifetime of capitalist indoctrination.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      They may not need to, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t. There seems to be an inverse relationship between wealth and skin thickness, which would make that of Google translucent…

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        It only makes sense.

        When you’re poor and not powerful, you get shit on daily and you grow a certain impervious callous to the constant assaults.

        When you’re rich and powerful, nobody ever tells you no, so the slightest of criticism is entirely strange and foreign and therefore unacceptable.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Eh, I think the consequences if they got caught out doing this would far outweigh the tiny benefits they get from it. Not to mention how incredibly easy it would be to get caught.

        Compare to other levers they could pull, like a small change in the YouTube algorithm to favour anti-union content. Which would have a far more wide-reaching impact, and would be far harder to prove causation.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          consequences if they got caught out doing this

          You mean like when Amazon was caught doing it and there was a couple days of memes and then nothing? I think Google could weather that breeze…

          As for that other lever, I’m pretty sure they’ve pulled it many times already 🤷