Slide with text: “Rust teams at Google are as productive as ones using Go, and more than twice as productive as teams using C++.”

In small print it says the data is collected over 2022 and 2023.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It sort of has nil. While a type can be null or undefined when evaluated, nil is used in many of the JS libraries and frameworks to mean something that is either null or undefined. So you’ll see functions like function isNil(value) { return value == null || value == undefined } and they’ll sometimes often confuse things even more be actually defining a nil value that’s just an alias for null which is just pointlessly confusing.

      As an aside, basically every language under the sun has NaN as it’s part of the IEEE floating point standard. JavaScript just confuses the situation more than most because it’s weakly typed so it doesn’t differentiate between integers, floats, or some other type like an array, string, or object. Hence anything in JS can be a NaN even though it really only has meaning for a floating point value.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        function isNil(value)

        We instead have function isNullOrUndefined(value) ... instead, but it does the same thing.

        It’s especially lame since you can’t just do if (!value) ... since that includes 0 (but not [] or {}, which Python considers falsey). It’s remarkably inconsistent…

        basically every language under the sun has NaN

        Yup, but you can use NotNan in Rust, just like your NonNull example.

        And yeah, it’s weird that JavaScript doesn’t have an integer type, everything is just floating point all the way down. I actually did some bitwise logic with JavaScript (wrote a tar implementation for the web), and you get into weird situations where you need to >>> 0 in order to get an unsigned 32-bit integer (e.g. (1 << 31) >>> 0). Those hacks really shouldn’t be necessary…

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because it’s floating point it also causes some REALLY strange bounds on integers. The maximum sized int you can safely store in JS is a 53 bit integer. That caused us all kinds of headaches when we tried to serialize a 64 bit integer and it started producing garbage results for very large values.