Wildlife officials say SpaceX launch left behind significant damage::undefined

  • kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What you said is correct except that they went into it ignoring the lessons of the past. NASA had done tons of testing and knew that the launch pad wouldn’t survive half the Starship’s thrust and designed a launch pad that worked. Space X instead chose to believe that a special concrete would be enough. The new launch pad is missing a flame diverter and will likely be the failure of the next vehicle. The iterative approach doesn’t work if you can’t get a launch clearance from the FAA due to a lack of trust.

    • a new sad me@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I recall something about the engineers in SpaceX wanting to follow NASA’s lesson and Elon basically telling them “trust me, we don’t need that”.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, all things considered, Musk is still part of what made SpaceX exist. Real world may work in obscure ways.

        • a new sad me@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s only that he didn’t make it happen via his (non-existing) genius. He made it via his deep pockets and ego.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you fully got the meaning of my comment. Other than that, Musk’s deep pockets were shallow at some point.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already did a static fire with the new deluge system and it seems to work just fine.

      The FAA has continued to trust SpaceX and issue licenses as they address issues. Keep in mind the FAA issues launch licenses for each of the hundreds of Falcon 9s they’ve launched so far, has issued more launch licenses for them than for any other company ever, and has a long working relationship at this point.

      Iterative design isn’t really a problem and we wouldn’t have reusable rockets at this point without it.

      • kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They static fired at half the thrust available again. There were no issues when they did that last time as well.