• astroturds@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear people that don’t watch trek think it’s just about lasers and technobabble.

    I know people that refused to watch Discovery because ‘they made it all woke and now it’s all about women’.

      • techno156@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s got a very TOS-style of writing and story to it.

        I remember seeing a fair few people pitch a fit about the Burn, for example, even though “angry man has a tantrum and nearly blows up the universe”, and “child with godlike powers” are common TOS plots.

        They tried something new, which I don’t mind them for, but I don’t think it mixed well with people being used to more TNG-styles plots, and the writing not being that great. Still, it managed to help kickstart the modern revival of Trek, and gave us (non-wheelchair) Captain Pike, so it wasn’t all bad.

    • Kleinbonum@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s also the problem with any kind of forum that satirizes conservatives on the internet: sooner or later, it will get flooded with right wingers who completely fail to understand that they’re being made fun of, and who will start posting the satirized content in all seriousness.

      Eventually, the original people who started the venue leave, and what’s left is just another right-wing echo chamber.

  • Cevilia (she/they/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Star Trek in 1966: *has a bridge crew containing a black female, Russian man, and faaaabulous Japanese man, each of whom holds the rank of full Lieutenant on their own abundant merits*

    • techno156@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And a Russian and Japanese crew member at the height of the Cold War. Not just as background, but as one of the main crew.

      • In Nichelle Nichols’ autobiography she talks about how the network insisted the scene be filmed both with and without the kiss, and of course, being good loyal actors, they complied. But, on takes without the kiss, something always seemed to go wrong… Shatner flubbed a line, the boom was in the shot, the cameras weren’t quite set up correctly… eventually they ran out of time and were forced, “reluctantly”, to submit only the takes with the kiss. I recommend Beyond Uhura. Also Kate Mulgrew’s “autobiography” of Captain Janeway is a great read too. :)

      • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And then, just as now, many said “I wouldn’t have a problem with it if they weren’t rubbing it in my face!”

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two things happened:

    1. culture wars are at an all time high due to right wing lies and attempts to push everyone not like them back into a culture of fear and hiding. So they are more sensitive to stuff they would not have batted an eye over before.

    2. stories no longer have men controlling everything and having all the authority/adventures

  • Emi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ‘Make It So’: ‘Star Trek’ and Its Debt to Revolutionary Socialism

    Beginning in 1966, the plot of “Star Trek” closely followed Posadas’s propositions. After a nuclear third world war (which Posadas also believed would lead to socialist revolution), Vulcan aliens visit Earth, welcoming them into a galactic federation and delivering replicator technology that would abolish scarcity. Humans soon unify as a species, formally abolishing money and all hierarchies of race, gender and class.