• Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you have government contracts, which is the way SpaceX survives, the rule is you have to consider everyone for employment that can be employed. That means you have to consider refugees as long as they can be legally employed. You don’t have to employ them but you can’t exclude them due to their status.

        • QHC@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would a refugee or asylum seeker “never have a chance” at getting hired by a company like SpaceX? Seems like that is part of the problem, no?

        • amzd@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can’t tell if you are assuming immigrants apply for jobs they aren’t qualified for or implying that spaceX will not hire immigrants

          • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m saying it’s common practice for companies in the US to “consider” candidates they have no intention of actually considering, because they already know who they want (or what ‘type’ of person they want) and that these are hoops companies jump through that don’t end up doing the things people expected the hoops to do.

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, cos it would make sense to hire newly arrived individuals from potentially non-friendly countries.

    • Cawifre@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Individuals from foreign nations would have their origin considered when they are processed for whatever level of secret clearance they needed to work on the government contact.