L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoYoung professionals are turning to AI to create headshots. But there are catcheswww.npr.orgexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up140arrow-down1external-linkYoung professionals are turning to AI to create headshots. But there are catcheswww.npr.orgL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredrekly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 year agoBut instead of learning stable diffusion and training their own model for better results for free, they’re paying a service for 100 images that likely won’t be well trained.
minus-squarebob_wiley@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-square8ender@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI love this take because it’s the modern ML version of shaming someone for not brewing their own beer
minus-squaredrekly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’m speaking in the context of the article which posits that AI is flawed. I’m arguing that it’s not flawed if you do it right, but the services that provide cheap AI headshots are lacklustre. I don’t expect everyone to learn it, but I also don’t think you should say it’s flawed unless you’ve tried to do it properly.
But instead of learning stable diffusion and training their own model for better results for free, they’re paying a service for 100 images that likely won’t be well trained.
deleted by creator
I love this take because it’s the modern ML version of shaming someone for not brewing their own beer
I’m speaking in the context of the article which posits that AI is flawed.
I’m arguing that it’s not flawed if you do it right, but the services that provide cheap AI headshots are lacklustre.
I don’t expect everyone to learn it, but I also don’t think you should say it’s flawed unless you’ve tried to do it properly.