And even if it was against US, I ment combat. There is no combat in Greenland so far. As soon as this started, NATO would break.

deleted by creator

Nope. They sent “troops” (like 15 people e.g. German), not AGAINST US, but exactly the opposite: To show Trump, that they take his security worries for real and that they can protect Greenland. Ridiculous.

I think it would just break down in THIS event: No country would want to stand against US for an icy island that isn’t their own. So one after the other would just let Greenland fall to the US, and that would practically mean the NATO is done - because there would be proof that the treaty doesn’t help in a real case.

Nope, I didn’t say there would be no war.

and - what do you think I’m thinking? And what do you think would happen in that hypothetical case?

No EU country will send troops against the US.

The NATO would cease to exist. Countries would need to decide which NATO country to stand by, and, seriously, NONE would oppose the USA. Thus, no NATO anymore.

It wouldn’t draw the NATO to war. It would be the end of NATO.

Are there any best practices for backing up Mastodon accounts/data?

Well, the world changes. Software that’s “finished”, starts rotting, because it doesn’t adapt to the changing environment.

You’re right. But the kind of immersion, the turning of the head stuff was the same back then. Elite: Dangerous is a good example for it.

Oh, “good” to know it’s abandoned 😬

Welcome to 2016. Sorry :[]