Creator of LULs (a script which helps links to point to your instance)
Come say hi here or over at https://twitch.tv/AzzuriteTV :) I like getting to know more people :)
Play games with me: https://steamcommunity.com/id/azzu
It’s going to switch from popular to unpopular once you say “songs that ask for the extermination of all people in Gaza” shouldn’t be censored.
There should be a line where songs/anything should be censored, but curse words obviously aren’t it.
No real idea if yours is “a beaut”, you haven’t shown the controller, only a marketing image of another controller of the same kind.
It’s quite obviously cheaper to not make it replaceable, otherwise they would do it globally. Companies are not that spiteful when it comes to money. The battery is probably already theoretically replaceable by repair shops with special tool or whatever, there was just an opening in the hull missing. So it’s likely just one or two pieces that have to be manufactured differently, the rest can stay the same.
Not YouTube, Soulseek. Nicotine frontend. Use a VPN.
I’m not sure what you’re saying. Easy to get feet pics or easy to make money with it?
Wait you’re telling me that women are better? So that differences between the sexes exist?
The inane thing is being able to skip semicolons. Exactly, why should anyone bother with that. We wouldn’t have this conversation. So yes, this is valid criticism of JavaScript, it’s not a very important one at all, but still.
There are languages that compile into JS or WebAssembly, might be worth to look at that. I like Clojurescript, but others are also good.
If you desire to interpret my comment as “shitting on people”, that is your prerogative. However, that is not how I meant it.
Thinking about things is great, and that opinion is actually contained in my comment, if you look closely: I want people to think, just not about things that aren’t really worth it.
The article is great, thinking about this in general is great, you just don’t want your future to be spent making decisions about where to place semicolons, that is not a beneficial use of one’s time. Without that thinking about where to place semicolons, you’re free to think about more useful topics.
To expand on this: Ideally you would work in a language you didn’t have these inane rules about semicolons, like the article is obviously good and correct, but it’s just not something that anyone should have to think about, it doesn’t lead to better programs.
… no
Degenerates want to get feet pics of people they know in some way, so as long as OP isn’t famous or already has some kind of following, that’s not going to work.
Random feet pics are something you can get at any point in time and don’t need to pay for.
It entirely depends on what you want the user experience to be like, and what ecosystem you choose.
So, no idea, give exact specifications.
Tl;dr: just put a semicolon at the end, and you never need to think, this is just not really worth it
Buuut… Why would you transport wind+solar 300 miles? A couple of miles, under 100 or so, sure, but why more than that?
Sometimes I wish we hadn’t get rid of evolutionary pressure in the way that we did. In ancient times, they would’ve died from this and hopefully not reproduced. Unfortunately, so many things that are stupid now carry almost no risk or at least much much less.
I’m glad of course it is like this, because it means that people who shouldn’t have died also benefit from improved medicine etc, so I don’t really want those times to return. But still, sometimes…
Custom domain from my ISP.
20 MB limit where? Not on my email inbox.
which would just about kill mj love for programming
How is the expectation of coding fast killing your love for programming, but stopping programming altogether and letting an AI do it is not?
It’s interesting that so many people are able to do this. For me, I’d just rather lose my job than do something I fundamentally disagree with. If I didn’t, I would just be so extremely unhappy that I couldn’t function anyway.
Not bashing you, just pondering the differences.
That is just mostly wrong. Around 90% of the time, when you do a review, just fixing the issue that you found is much faster than explaining the issue and saying what needs to be done instead.
Reviews plainly are for educating the contributor to what constitutes “non-shit”(using your terminology) code on the repo. If that wasn’t the case, you could just not do a review and just change the code, without any interaction at all. Why would you communicate the change that needs to be done otherwise?
Rarely of course, something is so complicated that it actually takes more time to come up with the right code than do a review. But that is only a rare thing.