New Epstein information just gets funneled into the burn bag incinerator

That’s how these lonely bigoted dorks with new money think being rich and powerful and cool works - overpay for whatever you want and force others to give it to you, with money you gained through slave labor, destructive practices, stealing from future generations and corruption. They think might makes right, so yeah, they think they’re elite for paying people to pretend to care about them when they’re not on stage or social media or in a board room.

If you weren’t around in the 80s, you would have loved it. Everything was this stupid. It was awesome.

You better stay alive, you sneaky little shit

Sorry, I ate the last frozen sock last night after work. Rough shift. Needed it.

Well they are trying to kill off as many poors as possible, so they don’t expect everyone to rebuy their likely more crappy than before shit.

We warned everyone - the rich love electing republicans because they crash everything and make people sell their stuff l, businesses and properties off cheap, it’s a fire sale for rich people, who then either hold on to that and borrow against it for more wealth, create monopolies, and raise prices further, or who just accrue more wealth and power for sport in this manner.

Yeah they boo’ed him hard, he acted like they cheered. Typical narcissist.

You have died of dysentery

But it made some already rich people even more rich, and that’s what’s important here

If ai doesn’t kill all the poors at their command it’s gonna be real funny when we use it against (peaceably of course) the rich who tried to employ it as a weapon against us all.

Kinda surprised Leto would turn down an awful role

Plus they largely pay their own bills. We are largely paying for the ai industry to overinflate their value and line their pockets before the bag holders buy in and it crashes.

Rubio asks everyone “would a guy with the biggest dick ever really even be able to sleep anyway?” Marco then held his hands two feet apart and nodded his head vigorously.

You okay bud? Khamenei being bad doesn’t make Trump less insane or less bad. Hope this helps.

Let’s be honest… he definitely never actually paid

You always get a glimpse of his true personality that shows he’s actually medically insane, like diagnosable as not understanding emotions in others, not having a correct theory of mind in others. All he can consider is what’s in it for him. He’d look beyond someone killing his loved ones (loved used very loosely here) if the killer had a great “deal” for him that enriched him enough or gave him enough power or favors.

I’m really focusing on saving up for some stickers with flames on them, that’ll speed it up as much as I can afford for a while

In an ideal world everyone would be completely scientifically literate and well read. In the real world we need to allow for people who don’t have the time or past education but who are interested and can get drawn in by simple titles on social media and manage to find articles that communicate science well enough to get them a foot in the door, hopefully to the point they then get into reading the actual papers. Someone could have linked the actual paper here. That title wouldn’t have drawn in newbies, it’s “Strings from almost nothing”. A novice to sciences would have little to perhaps zero idea what that means. At least this gives an idea, and it wasn’t really misleading in the way clickbait is, it was just shorthanded enough to make pedantic curmudgeons triggered enough to complain about it and rattle on with me in comments.

The title, due to a necessary brevity in how titling works on social media these days, doesn’t convey the actual meaning of the finding - they aren’t saying they found the theory in their data or observations or calculations, they’re saying in their data and observations and calculations emerged a core, defining feature of string theory. They didn’t find the theory, they found a very specific feature that is found in string theories, and that’s pretty neat.

“In a string theory framework, as you increase the energy transfer between particles, you will see a swift fall off in the probability that the particles will scatter. It’s like the particles don’t even want to scatter off one another, but rather pass freely,” Cheung says. “The scattering amplitudes don’t go to infinity. It’s better behaved.”

The researchers used this ultrasoft behavior as one of their core assumptions. They also assumed a property called “minimal zeros,” which limits the number of special points where scattering probabilities vanish.

“Remarkably, consistency requires scattering amplitudes not only to interact but also to not interact at special kinematic points called ‘zeros.’ The assumption of ‘minimal zeros’ demands the sparsest number of such vanishing points mathematically allowed by the equations,” Cheung says.

From only these assumptions, the researchers demonstrated mathematically that the resulting solutions naturally reproduced the central features of string theory, including its characteristic spectrum of particles and interaction strengths.

“The precise details of string theory emerged automatically, including the infinite tower of massive spinning particles that form the ‘harmonics’ of the string that the theory is famous for,” says co-author Grant N. Remmen (PhD ’17), the James Arthur Postdoctoral Fellow at New York University.