

So what, no one would be allowed to teach others about their religion?
That’s a level of control i don’t think any organisation or government should have.
So what, no one would be allowed to teach others about their religion?
That’s a level of control i don’t think any organisation or government should have.
Banning religion full stop is wrong and won’t stop belief.
However, religion should not have any special protections that other groups do not get.
Religion should not exclude people from mandatory childhood vaccines, religion should not be a mitigating factor in vilification or defamation cases etc.
Yes, and that’s why we don’t allow people to flood school, hospitals and homes with water. It is controlled and diverted.
Because religion can be and has been used to convince people to do terrible things. The fewer false beliefs people hold the fewer things can be used to manipulate them in this way.
The most important tenet of conservatism is to just assume the past is what you think it was.
Huge fan of Princess Mononoke.
Not sure what exactly it is, but the characters and setting have just stuck with me since the first time I saw it.
Definitive proof that God isn’t gay. He hates foreskin.
There’s a few. Rocky Horror Picture Show is probably the one you’re thinking of though.
I went to an interactive showing a few years ago and had a blast.
Some people in the audience did a whole call and response thing with the narrator which was a lot of fun.
Thanks bro. lgtm.
It is, as padStart, which makes the number of packages using leftpad even more incomprehensible
People love to take moral stances / talk about sacrificing for the greater good, until their behaviour has to change.
Can you… get a grip? I didn’t say anything like that at all.
I think you have a real problem reading what people actually wrote.
Not supporting fascism would be fantastic.
You’re saying that like the liberals didn’t still get a third of votes. Willing to bet they did much better amongst Christians than non Christians.
That’s because water is necessary to life.
When doing risk analysis something that is required to keep people alive gets a few extra points towards being accessible for, hopefully, obvious reasons.
If even something that is necessary for life is controlled due to the danger it poses, you can imagine why people would seek to restrict dangerous things that people can live without.