what a naive, closed-minded, and belittling opinion.

No link? wtf guardian

“never point a weapon at someone you don’t intend to kill”

seems less-than-ideal. looks like he’s losing a lot of pressure at the unsealed joint between the nozzle and the bellows. also very heavy. maybe if he rigged up some sort of pully mechanism and thinned the clay body, as well as finding some way to seal that joint it could be more successful. then again, the pot already broke being very thick so perhaps not.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

EW A ROOSTER JIZZED IN MY BREAKFAST

here i think we mostly agree, but students already have extra protections and responsibilities above the level of common citizens. what further protections and/or responsibilities are required here?

its not a red herring, the positive argument has yet to be made on your part: on what basis should zionism be a protected class?

i feel like the genocide practiced by and supported by zionists is sufficient justification for an anti-zionist stance. it is certainly sufficient for an anti-nazi stance: can you imagine someone saying “the insertuon of someone saying ‘but genocide’ to justify pro -nazi hate only supports my point.” in that context? thats what you sound like to me. you sound like a nazi supporter dancing around their de facto support of genocide.

they havent seen fit to do that in the last 80+ years since they chartered the country on occupied territory. they have seen the deaths, looting, rapes, and so on over that time (all classified im sure youll be absolutely devastated to learn as terrorism, not that the word really means anything other than “enemy”) committed by the chosen people as it was committed unto them by the nazis in turn, folding their arms in callous disregard, and said, “the ends justify the means.”

there can be more than one terrorist at a time. i dare say three or even four might be possible.

even if the un werent overwhelmingly biased and laughably ineffective, you are appealing to authority instead of answering the relevant accusation of genocide. i will go further and say if one’s right to exist is dependent on stealing land and murdering the inhabitants on any scale, let alone the scale in practice by israel, that claim of right to exist is the merest rhetoric justifying the most blatant and obvious and atrocious crimes against nature and humanity i have seen in my lifetime.

I doubt uncle thomas could survive anything more than sustained masturbation, for instance.

S L A M S

It’s still an upgrade from the books, sadly.

writes a lot, anyway

“force your opinion out of you over an hours long conversation like a normal friendly person”

time for some self reflection there, baroque

i happen to agree with you too, as would i think anyone who has spent time in an american projects or shelter system, but youve so thoroughly poisoned the argument i cant take it up here.

yes

It’s not that they’re indifferent- not that they don’t care. It’s punishment. Anything to make their lives worse is a good thing. The prisoners “deserve” this treatment. Also, they’re slaves and have no real standing to challenge the treatment under the law (source: vibes).

math is hard

only 50 seconds, by my math