Don’t put that evil on Hailey Welch, she doesn’t seem like the “goes to psychics for policy decisions for my dementia addled husband’s presidency” type, Hawk Tua hurl would have sucked him out of the presidency and into the old folks home instead.

Slurped him into a theocracy

Kari Lake is already pulling the same schtick in Arizona, other repugnicans have tried as well all across the country, so no definitely not going away anytime soon.

Love how not just this cop but all black cops carry water for white supremacy. Sure law enforcement needs to be done, but they don’t need racists, homo/transphobes, antisemites/islamophobes, ideological nationalists, or any other extremist piece of shit in their ranks, shit just further erodes public trust, just like this cop’s statement and stance does.

If the US military gets rid of them the cops should too, and the US military now does, hence what Tommy Tuberville’s promotion block was all about, because that scumbag wanted to reverse the ban on white supremacists and Nazis in the military because he said they were “patriots” too, fuck that noise.

Cops need need accountability, oversight, and standards, immediately.

Tracy Morgan: “gurgle gurgle”

The Reagans fucked this country like Hollywood fucked Nancy’s mouthhole.

As anyone should

Michelle Bachman thanks you for forgetting her and her life partner Marcus…

I did too, and that’s why I went to what the source embarrassingly was, but yeah I’m in total agreement with you.

You’re definitely not wrong, that show and Idiocracy also have some pretty dystopian alternatives.

Eventually all business entities will be Taco Bell!

To finish the quote on her CIA relationship, since context is important:

In May 1975, Redstockings, a radical feminist group, published a report that Steinem and others put together on the Vienna Youth Festival and its attendees for the Independent Research Service.[112][113] Redstockings raised the question of whether Steinem had continuing ties with the CIA, which Steinem denied.[114] Steinem defended her relationship to the CIA, saying: “In my experience The Agency was completely different from its image; it was liberal, nonviolent and honorable.”

Honestly I figured the context would clear things up, but the rest of the quote makes her come off as an apologist for an organization known to play as dirty as the KGB, and especially during that era. However just because something is funded by an entity such as the CIA doesn’t always mean that the organization is part of, partner in, or even a willing partner with something like the CIA, same with the KGB or its descendants, espionage operates on leverage, and it all depends on what kind of hold you have over the “asset(s)”.

Jodie Comer is going to be so good in something like this, she’s fun to watch. Ralph Fiennes also always brings it.

Can’t wait to see how the 28 Days Later world has progressed, or I guess, regressed.

129 pages!?! Wtf…

I just wrote training documentation on an IT technology and it wasn’t even that long.

Wake me up when Trump sees even just a shred of accountability, or Musk, or Bezos, or …

It’s definitely not as comedic as the trailers have shown, it’s a fairly serious series and deals with a lot of depressing stuff, overall I loved the first season, but knowing the fate of one of the major factions that I identified most with kinda bummed me out.

deleted by creator

The NYPD should have been broken up when they tried to kill Frank Serpico, or we could go back about a hundred years and they should have been broken up when the Tamany Hall corruption machine infiltrated the NYPD thoroughly.

I’m from NYC, I’ve got a lot of family in the NYPD and DoC, and the NYPD is more than a hundred years past due to be broken up. They should separate the department into county>borough>city>village>town departments, so they can all watch and investigate each other until acceptable levels of corruption have been achieved. (acceptable levels are usually a very low percentages of corruption, we’ll never completely eliminate it, so the goal is to get it as low as we can.)

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely

Lord Acton (1887)

The full quote is pretty poignant as well:

“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.”

Lord Acton had some pretty good bangers on this topic:

“Despotic power is always accompanied by corruption of morality.”

And:

“Authority that does not exist for Liberty is not authority but force.”

Also:

“Everybody likes to get as much power as circumstances allow, and nobody will vote for a self-denying ordinance.”

Lastly:

“Absolute power demoralizes.”

It’s not wizardry, it’s that our political/legal system has been avoiding the question of “Can you indict a President (current or former)?” ever since Nixon.

I believe we answered this question back in the 1770’s when we sent our king a letter telling him to fuck off, then beat his army and sent them packing. Then we re-answered this question in 1812 when we fought off the Brits again and Canada, who burnt down our original white house, but ultimately told the king to fuck off again ans sent his army and allies packing again. Then we told Jefferson Davis and his supporters fuck off when he tried to take over as the unelected “President”, aka King/Tyrant/Despot/Dictator, although with all of the Confederate “heritage”, flags, statues, and terrorist groups (KKK) that still exist it doesn’t seem like we told the Confederates to fuck off hard enough, we probably should have let Sherman tell each and every one of them “fuck off” in person.

Anyway, my point is that we’ve already had this discussion three times and the answer to every King and wannabe King has been “fuck off” followed by a lot of killing, I’m not so sure we should be going for a forth time, especially not for an orange diaper wearing nepo baby traitor.