Deleted my Facebook in 2006 because a terrible person from my hs died from a drug overdose when i was in my freshman year of college. I posted something like “death is sad but he was not a good person and i won’t miss him” and got jumped on by a bunch of people i already thought were annoying, so i said “fuck this whole website”. It was still when you needed to be in a school to join.

It’s been a crazy ride all these years watching all the terrible things that Facebook does, and people just keep using it. Helped elect trump. Steals and launders art. Takes advantage of all your data. Fosters terrorism and crimes. Just a huge shit hole. “but it has its own built in craigslist!” 🙄😒

Sick Sad World from Daria. I’d love that show

My 300$ earbuds can play two sources at once. But an uncompressed signal? Fuck yourself.

They are laundering the creative works of humans. That’s it. The end. They are laundering machines for art. They should be treated and legislated as such.

I stupid. Is there somewhere that says everything this does?

Not me. I’m pretty normal. I call it sober #2.

The paramount+ app doesn’t even know how to properly hide the pause icon after you hit resume ffs. It’s been months.

Sounds like the photographic equivalent of doping

Iunno, man. If you ask me, they’re just laundering emotions. Not producing any new or interesting feelings. There is no empathy, it’s only a mirror. But I hope you and your AI live a long happy life together.

Well said. “Art launderers” is the best ai descriptor I’ve come across so far.

I absolutely can. Parody is an art form, which is something that can exclusively only be created by human beings. AI is an art laundering service. Not an artist.

The law should reflect that these companies need to be first granted permission to use datasets by the rights holders, and creative commons licenses need to be given an opportunity to opt out of being crawled for these datasets. Anything else is wrong. Machines are not humans. Creative common copyright law was not written with the concept of machines being “consumers”. These companies took advantage of the sudden emergence of these models and the delay of law in holding their hunger for data in check. They need to be held accountable for their theft.

deleted by creator

What makes you think copyright law doesn’t apply to companies using copy written data to sell and profit off of? That is not the case. Also, you’re putting words in my mouth. Feel free to read my other replies on this thread but I don’t feel like repeating myself, but I think it’s clear I’m not saying computers aren’t allowed to process data that’s absurd.

You can try to equate humans to computers all day, and you can even pass laws that says they’re the same thing. That does not make it true. A company using software to profit off data they have not licensed (whether it’s public or not does not matter! That is not how copyright law works!) is theft.

Please try to sell DVDs of markiplier’s publicaly available YouTube content and tell people how you’re allowed to because it’s publicaly available.

In actual computer science you talk about AI all the time as well but it’s not actually intelligent is it? It’s just SmarterChild 2.0 and literally has no idea what word it said just before it’s current one. Not intelligent. Words are often used inappropriately. The only thing computers can consume is data and electricity by definition, and consuming data is not the same as implementing it in a language (or visual) model that you intend to profit from. This is data theft, unless properly licensed.

Consuming is not the same thing as training. A machine is not a consumer, it is a tool.

Where the fuck you at Minnesota? Been legal over a year and no dispensaries anywhere. Wtf?

No! But now i have a new place i wanna visit 😁

Honestly I’d sooner try to fundraise and find a way to hire a person to actually do the job way before I’m going to start taking 5 minutes at every single trip to fill out information. The idea of community made data sets like this is very utopic and nice, but if you ask me it’s asking a lot. After all, everybody can edit Wikipedia to make it a better place too, but everybody knows there’s only a handful of dedicated Wikipedia gurus.

They’re going to have another one, too.