Studies show that feeling hot makes people act grumpier
Studies show that feeling hot makes people act grumpier
Only to launch a different app that is “MSIX packaged and signed”
Saved you a click
The names seem to be getting shorter so maybe “look” or just “oOo”
They can recharge mid-day when generation is highest, which helps balance supply, and in theory they could still help in the afternoon after they finish their routes say 5/6pm
Sarcasm doesn’t translate well amongst strangers via text, it’s why we’ve got shortcuts like “/s” everyone should use
I disagree with a lot of what the people in this article are saying, except for not testing. I see no point, because my behavior won’t change. Not because I’m going to “hide it on my vacation” but because I’m going to rest in bed and mask in public regardless of what virus I’m infected with!
I think the technical term is: But muh ecomnomie!
Somewhat related, back in highschool I was really enjoying chemistry class. Super fun stuff, definitely a career path. Then when we were doing the math practices, I got a question wrong that I knew I combined correctly.
I asked the teacher and she said “oh yeah that one just doesn’t follow the rules” instantly killed my enjoyment of chemistry.
“camped” out in Quebec, my son speaks better French than me and has corrected me all weekend, but we’ll see whose in charge when I poke him in the eyes two seconds before totality… Or squeal like a school girl as it approaches, we’ll see which happens!
In before this feature is discontinued by Google.
As another comment noted, this negatively affects pollinators too
Netflix, video calls and looking at old pictures is the impression I got.
It depends, if they’re spending say… $60 each? That’s enough to pay a minimum wage employee at least. Also remember these are conservative numbers I’ve made up. It’s likely that people visit more than once per year, sometimes spend more, sometimes spend less exc.
Assuming 10% of 100,000 is 10k divided by 18 stores is 555 customers each. If everyone only goes once a year, and theyre all open 5 days a week, they still each have 2 customers per day
I think the bigger problem is that there are only two parties. Having the biggest party lead the house wouldn’t be as big of an issue if they were still a minority of the total collection.
That’s really more a bar on state religion, that again doesn’t really prevent our new speaker from say proposing a bill that donates Federal funds to his favorite church, so long as the government isn’t in control of said church.
None of that says that church and state must be separate, just that there can be no religious test. There’s nothing in there barring him from saying “I think God blesses the people here”
In fact, to really be edgy, that also doesn’t prevent the government from say donating $10B each year to some Christian church.
To your second point, I never suggested that the Constitution says we should base our laws around the Bible.
My only point is the oft quoted Separation of church and state is only an idea from the Jefferson papers. If you want to make sure church and state remain separate, and the new speaker doesn’t start using federal funds for his church, perhaps it’s time to actually put separation into the Constitution?
The new one is more focused on the district level though right? IE you’re not building around the generator, just where to build new generators, mines, etc?