At the time maybe, but a lot of smaller details such as this will become much more important later on when the dust settles. So, why not write it up now so that ot can be revisited later on. It’s not as if there’s a limit to the number of acticles they can publish.
Well if all you are used to is your establishment talking heads in narrow lockstep then it might be off putting. It isn’t at all damning for a single outlet to report on something. Especially when working somewhere so dangerous to be.
In reality this is, as others seem to be at pains to point out, a minor addition to the mountian of nightsoil. It wouldn’t make a lot of sense to fabricate such a lightweight appendix if it is likely to undermine reporting on more serious events.
Calling it branding isn’t entirely out of scope with the normal usage of the word either. It just is slightly problematic in that we are now conditioned to expect the very worst of humanity from some of the IDF soldiers so our minds expect hot irons.
Writing the number on their foreheads is flat out dehumanising. How is that in any way contentious?
If your local police force rounded up all the males in a minority group and wrote the processing numbers on their foreheads do you think it might make the news?
Not sure if the future tense ‘will’ is appropriate here
This is the point. Whether ice is likely to form is a very important aspect of weather.
Is it going snow instead of rain. Are the roads going to be treacherous. Will my water supply stop flowing.
Back in the day when cellphones could only take calls.
More like Gary Abuse-y! ba dum tish
𝕴𝖙 𝖎𝖘 𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖊 𝖋𝖔𝖗 𝖞𝖔𝖚 𝖙𝖔 𝖗𝖊𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖓 𝖙𝖔 𝖗𝖊𝖉𝖉𝖎𝖙!
🄲🄾🅄🄻🄳 🄱🄴 🅲🅾🆄🅻🅳 🅱🅴 🄲🄾🅄🄻🄳 🄱🄴 🅲🅾🆄🅻🅳 🅱🅴
New board game just dropped! Smugglers of Canaan.
There’s a bit of a difference in sentencing between premeditated murder and manslaughter
Nobody asking if the bag belonged to Baggenstos? Nominative determinism win?
They’ve still got a good reputation for news. So good that after a few combative interviews with Tory MPs (back when they were in power a few years ago) the Culture Secretary wanted to sell the channel off.
Don’t get me wrong they can still produce the occasional good comedy or documentary but they used to do so consistently.
You won’t get any disagreement from me on the corrosive effects of advertising.
I do think that Channel 4 used to regularly produce greater content than it can now. But that probably is more to do with advertising revenue being leeched away to online platforms and the growth of its direct competitors.
Well the distinction here is that TV license paying citizens of the UK don’t get the ads.
All Sunnis and all Shiites hate each other? Even unto death?
Well then they must be truely barbaric and therefore deserving of the decades of avarice inspired wrath meted out upon them by successive US governments and their proxy settler colony.
100%