Hence saying you just needed open ears to know. He was broadcasting who he was back then. It was no secret.
Hence saying you just needed open ears to know. He was broadcasting who he was back then. It was no secret.
Turned into? 10 years ago it was obvious if you had open ears.
Except my understanding is Baldwin would be the Hellcat owner in this case. He was the producer and the film hired a company to handle the guns that was known to have issues and be irresponsible. I’m not intimately familiar with the case but from what I remember he was being reckless with that choice and it sounds like he was being reckless with the gun as well.
I have 0 level of trust for any information from this website.
I think it’s more often an involuntary manslaughter charge due to the gross negligence of allowing a child access to a gun. But sometimes it can be counted as murder even if it was unintentional if you were doing something so reckless and stupid you should have realized it would likely result in someone’s death. There’s an argument to be made that keeping a gun somewhere a child could access it would count.
This is a valid point because I think it affects openness to change. Linus may be a dumbass in some regards, but I’d be willing to bet he’s open to change.
Really all you had to do was ever hear anything from him. He was clear about who he was.