The argument is utterly stupid.
Ignoring that it is building on a fantasy reality for the moment. Even if you had free healthcare, and if only the financial costs of survival motivated people to get jobs, then the other costs of living, like for food and shelter, would still provide that motivation.
Whoever came up with that stupid word filter and decided to follow through on it without proper human review that the filter matched what they meant to find, is pretty trans-intelligent.
The company has not released information on whether, or how long, it has spent mapping out or testing the driverless technology on Austin’s streets.
That’s being too nice, the CEO is clearly proud of not mapping cities, as seen in the tweets. The journalist should call it out explicitly. “They are probably not mapping as suggested by the CEO’s public posts.” That’s not too much of a leap.
That Economic Times article cites a Kyiv Insider article, but doesn’t link it, which I consider terrible journalism.
Here’s the link: https://kyivinsider.com/orbans-hungary-is-now-officially-the-poorest-nation-in-the-eu/
In that case you can play Witcher 3 instead, I’ll allow it
Doesn’t “citizenship” mean where you’re born?
Only in the new world continents. In Africa, Europe, and Asia it normally means what country your parents and grandparents are from, unless someone in the chain naturalises to a different country.
poor states with lower average income will spend a higher percentage of income
But the graphic uses an absolute USD value of 1000, so percentage of income isn’t represented. It seems more like the big ass trucks are an issue in more swaths of the great plains than just in Texas.
I wonder how betrayed the people in the Appalachian feel when their supposed “own” Vance stood for this.
They are hardly even in the US market. Only via Murena with their e/OS/.
Perfect, thank you!
Those are both way more useful than exploiting a lazy coder’s fuckup
I never said social engineering, physical breaching, exerting force on people, and other ways of compromising systems weren’t useful. They just aren’t hacking to me, otherwise the term is too broad to be very useful.
You’re free to come up with your own definition, I was asked to define it and that’s my best shot for now.
You know my first instinct wast to reply with: “No.”
Maybe I should have stuck with that. I had a feeling this would lead nowhere.
here’s the link, sorry it’s reddit
Where?
I’d start with the following, and refine if necessary:
“Gaining unauthorized access to a protected computer resource by technical means.”
* Those first two actually happened in 2001 here in Switzerland when the WEF visitors list was on a database server with default password, they had to let a guy (David S.) go free
** The governor and his idiot troupe eventually stopped their grandstanding and didn’t file charges against Josh Renaud of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter, luckily
I haven’t heard of a firewall failing open when overwhelmed yet. Usually quite the opposite, a flood disables access to more than just the targeted device, when the state table overflows.
But maybe there is a different mechanism I’m not aware of. How would the DDoS change the properties of ingress?
DDoS is not hacking
Subsurface scattering is not one of the things you get automatically with ray tracing. If you just bounce the rays off objects as would be the usual first step in implementing ray tracing you don’t get any light penetration into the object, so none of that depth.
Maybe you meant ambient occlusion?
Did he just chicken out from chickening out?
Yes it’s very common, which is why everyone of even mild intelligence knows to check the results of a plain full text search.