Is that the legit reason? I mean, in the times I grew up in, I would assume you’re being dramatic to prove a point.

Have you considered that you always misunderstood people’s goals and they were actually trying to warn you of this exact coming situation?

This isn’t some stupid timeline, it’s the result of 50 years of very specific effort by the right that the people you thought were being dramatic were just plainly warning you about with the appropriate level of urgency.

I really don’t understand how in the face of all this people still choose to bury their heads in the sand.

I love the desert heat. Chapped lips aside it’s my dream.

Chapped lips in the summer? I’ve only ever gotten chapped lips in winter.

Did anybody ever not sour on this testicular sore of a human being?

I’ve always said the difference between a true conspiracy theorist and a fucking loon is proof.

There’s tons of stuff we know happened and have almost overwhelming proof of but the powers that be for some reason will not prosecute, that’s a conspiracy and they might even be part of it.

If you believe that a myriad aliens are pretending to be human and secretly controlling the world and the only immediate proof is that we are becoming more inclusive, you’re a fucking loon.

He’s their useful idiot!

Hey I actually know this guy

Ah yes, the freedom of owning a car.

This is all true. Kinda surprising. Memes about Canada are usually pretty incorrect.

According to the article, yeah.

“Could any picture sum up our new men’s rights movement better?” the writer asked. “The smirk of a male who’s knows he’s protected by a misogynist sporting establishment enjoying the distress of a woman he’s just punched in the head, and whose life’s ambition he’s just shattered.”

This fucking smug cunt.

I park illegally to get coffee in Montreal all the time, but I don’t do it-

-on crosswalks

-on bike paths

-for fucking Tim Hortons “coffee”.

Vote like your and your loved ones’ lives depends on it, because they probably do.

I was told my calves were absolutely shredded by an attractive woman. I’ll carry that to my grave.

Wait but Joe Rogan told me it’s governed by a communist, I don’t know what that is but it can’t be good

Looks like things are getting pretty stressful in the MAGA/Couch-Fucker party.

Spot on, dude is weird as fuck. I wouldn’t leave him alone with a woman who wasn’t absolutely gushing with consent

I’m part of the rest of society and I agree with their methods. I haven’t been propagandized into thinking protests shouldn’t be disruptive (ignorable). They’ve got you thinking minor inconvenience = utter contempt (which for some reason you chose to write two comments in a row), and that for some reason deserves prison time.

Think about it, really, imagine this was coming from someone you respect enough to make you consider changing your mind; should protests that cause no bodily harm be a criminal offence? Should the people not have a way to truly disrupt the system if our existence is at stake? Is the convenience of the ignorant more important than our survival? I’d love to hear your honest answers to these questions.

I really don’t mind if the mildly inconvenienced thousands of people. If in a functioning democracy our powers are threefold - the vote, the media and protest, and peaceful protest by its very nature is a protest that can be ignored, then no change can be affected by non disruptive protest. In my opinion this isn’t disruptive enough. If we treated this climate crisis with the urgency it deserves then we would take a page out of the European book and block highways with concrete bollards.

Make no mistake, our children will burn and we’re worried about missing a flight.

I think it’s safe to say that if they gave up their freedom for the cause of trying to save us and our descendants from climate catastrophe then they are absolutely morally superior to both of us. The mistake you make is thinking that the law has a single thing to do with moral superiority, it only deals in financial superiority.