Here’s the pic:
Here’s the pic:
I guess I can see that, it is ridiculous. The difference is that this news comes across as completely believable to me instead of as skirting the line of believability like a “proper” post would do.
Why is this on Not The Onion?
Umm, akshually, there would be a number of options to try first, depending on the circumstances:
I’m a fellow man, but I assume the primary difference between our nipples and theirs is not sensitivity so much as it is that theirs will swing around and rub against things a lot more.
I guess it depends on the employer. I don’t do office work myself, but according to what I’ve heard from my wife about her jobs in banking adjacent fields, she has a few different queues of things to do that everyone takes from.
The way you phrased this could go either way: were you never taking on more work, no matter how obviously it needed to get done, just because you weren’t explicitly told to do that job? Because that would be a fair criticism in my estimation.
That’s not what they are saying at all. They’re saying small vehicles aren’t even safe in crashes with other small vehicles, let alone with bigger vehicles.
I liked the method some subreddits have where there’s always a pinned comment that community members can upvote/downvote for how relevant it is.
Mind explaining why?
As someone who is much more centrist/liberal, I had to block a whole bunch of leftist communities recently just so that I could keep enjoying the Fediverse. I would have greatly prefered not to, but so much of leftist content on here is far too cynical to any other position.
Is that supposed to be a Roman soldier holding a submachine gun?
If you ever want to try creating your own floating mat, this guy goes through the steps that worked for him: https://howtorewild.co.uk/actions/build-a-floating-bog/
Considering there were probably a large group of people who showed up just to see Trump, and that it is more awkward to boo than it is to clap, I think that was actually a pretty decent showing.
Obviously, it would still be stacked against the employee, but the biggest thing would be that the person under investigation could sue the law firm and hurt the law firm and their client through social media or by encouraging unionization if there was any proof of misconduct during the investigation.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but that was only one user who made that comparison, and they got downvoted hard for that.
Just because you shouldn’t trust them doesn’t mean you’re not allowed to interact with them. It just means you need to be careful.
deleted by creator
It looks like you probably don’t have enough edge for this, but a simple vise grip could work.