Sure but if it is easily debunked in a youtube video by a kon scientist I wonder if we should be regarding that particular topic as science.

If you are in a position to criticize other people’s science, youtube is probably not the platform of choice.

Sauceius

Oh god

Under the right fan. Although, it looks like there is a card there already.

The proof that the US is being dismantled could not be clearer. There is no other explanation for the fact that science is being actively targeted to this extent.

Please open a book. Remember: it only counts if it contains more sentences than pictures.

The article contains a number of what seems to be assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a behaviour not representative of these people as a group. It’s notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.

Yes but appdata subfolder is local, locallow or roaming so the poster above you is still correct.

Well of course it will be different. One has to do with another author publishing questionable data and the other would be related to misunderstanding of someone else’s published data. In this case, the use of AI in writing is implied to result in authors not being in control of what they themselves publish.

All of these are bad but do not necessarily arise on purpose. But let’s not add ways to muddy the already mudied waters of science.