• 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle


  • I agree and use Signal myself.
    But people like the extra features of WhatsApp like desktop/web clients with seamless history sync and all the other little things that WhatsApp provides.
    The average Joe doesn’t even think about security or privacy, they just know that the results of using WhatsApp are superior than using SMS.
    iMessage is a non starter everywhere out of the US, it just doesn’t have the market penetration.
    As an Australian, no one I know (many of whom own iPhones) talk about the blue-green bubble stuff.
    They recognise where the fault lies and simply don’t use the app.











  • You can interoperate with googles RCS.
    If you are willing and able to enter a partnership like Samsung, you can do it fully (including encryption support etc).

    Google are determined to not make it easy, and I agree with you, it appears to be yet another messaging land grab.

    Trying to put myself in their headspace for a moment, one justification for making it hard is to stop thousands of apps coming out declaring “full RCS support!” through the APIs, then screwing the pooch (through poor security or deliberate back doors or or or).
    Right now Google are desperately attempting to make RCS happen, after almost a decade of trying and failing to make various carriers play ball.
    They do not want any bad press about how feature poor/insecure/slow/buggy it is right now.


  • Mountaineer@aussie.zonetoAndroid@lemdro.idIs RCS an open standard?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Only Google can make an RCS app

    Yes and no.
    You don’t need to make your own OS, but you do need to implement support for the RCS protocol within your app, rather than piggyback on Googles APIs.

    I don’t like it, but there’s no legal requirement for google to provide those APIs, like they did with SMS etc.




  • FOSS is enshitification-hardened, not proof.

    VLC remains awesome because the guy (maybe Jean-Baptiste Kempf?) that controls the project has refused to be bought, has in fact refused HUGE sums of money.

    The original author of any project has to right to sell it with the corresponding licence changes at any time.
    There’s some legal grey area on something like Linux or VLC which have MANY MANY developer hands in the pie, and existing users could certainly fork off the existing releases, but VLC could pivot tomorrow to a for profit company and make future releases of the official VLC a paid product, if they choose too.