• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2023

help-circle










  • Keep cooking. Players should be evaluated using how well they play, not how much success their team has. This is evident in how the regular season is often regarded as meaningless, when it has a far larger sample size than the playoffs and isn’t as heavily influenced by matchups. A lot of people here don’t watch games or care about technicalities so meaningless noise like game 7 stats, elimination game stats, clutch etc are viewed as more significant than multiple regular seasons’ worth of games.

    I thought Giannis was underrated when people were saying that AD>Giannis and that he wasn’t top 10, but the glazing after his team won a ring due to injuries to the Nets was insane. Like this dude is the same player and he could’ve won in previous years if the 2 or 3 teams better than the Bucks were hurt too. Hell, he could’ve won series like the Heat in 2020 or the Raptors in 2019 if his team got hot enough like last year’s Heat team.

    IMO it’s just people wanting to make every win ‘deserved’ instead of acknowledging the importance of luck. Just look at how generational talents like Harden and Barkley are disrespected despite being better than most FMVPs. Media/fan narratives also play a big part. Giannis and Jokic being the best of their generation doesn’t mean that they’re necessarily comparable to the best of previous generations or better than anyone who wasn’t the best in their own generation. No matter what they achieve, Steph is better, not because his team dominated the past few years, but because barring any massive leaps from Giannis or Jokic, Steph will have peaked much higher. If Steph retired after 2016 he would still be better and if he got injured and bounced in the first round every year he would still be better.