• 8 Posts
  • 2.87K Comments
Joined 3 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年12月28日

help-circle



  • A dildo also isn’t able to consent. A carrot isn’t able to consent and is more alive than the roadkill (since it can still reproduce).

    A dildo was never alive, and a carrot is not a sentient creature.

    Ability to consent is something we require from conscious beings, but we generally don’t require it from objects, and corpses blur the line.

    Why does a corpse blur the line? Or is this DnD logic and a corpse is just an object? A corpse should be treated like the person it was, so it still needs consent otherwise you’re still raping it.

    but it isn’t actually that easy to come up with a consistent justification for that condemnation.

    It absolutely is: a sentient (not even sapient, but sentient) being’s bodily autonomy is inviolable without their consent.

    Extending your logic to make my point, if a corpse is blurring the line, what about brain dead coma patients, especially ones that are infertile? Are they ok to rape? They’re alive and can’t reproduce, so what’s the difference, right?