

Exactly, the 1980s existed and some of us were alive then. I was too young to see coke in high school as I started in 1989 but older siblings absolutely did.


Exactly, the 1980s existed and some of us were alive then. I was too young to see coke in high school as I started in 1989 but older siblings absolutely did.


deleted by creator


Yes but ideologically China is not aligned with fascism at all. They are on paper still pretending to be Marxists. Fascism is opposed to Marxism.


Authoritarian, which you already mentioned.


They are talking about car subsidies which China does and not all countries do in all markets.


Only if it had something to do with race. If it’s because you don’t think their manufacturing standards are high enough to feel safe that wouldn’t be racist per se.


China is closer to neo-mercantilism due to the level if direct state involvement in private business.


Unfortunately I already have been assaulted


First many people who aren’t women are sexually assaulted. Im one of them. Fuck your sexism, no seriously fuck your sexism.
Second the humor here is based on the bad title writing not the sexual assault. If the word “groped” was replaced by “robbed” the source of humor would be the exact same thing, namely that the headline suggests the airline was involved in said crimes.
Finally the world is a hard place already. Do you need to go around policing other’s humor? If so why and who gave you the right to determine what is acceptable?
You don’t need to reply because Im blocking you as you clearly aren’t someone with anything to offer.
In conclusion fuck your sexism.


My mom’s 2020 Fit at the top trim level sold new for roughly 20k. Her lease buyout price was 1/2 the cost of an entry Fit in the same year with 30k miles (going for 25k at the time)


Why would the teens want the airlines to help grope them?


deleted by creator
Only fascists have power levels. “Hide your power level” is some Proudboy Brownshirt shit.


My take is they are less defenders of copyright and are rather less interested in bearing the brunt of an infringement lawsuit caused by people posting content they do not have rights to.


Can you not use ableist language when insulting people, please?


Newsrooms were not operated at a loss. Newsrooms and the business side rarely interacted so as to keep up the appearance of journalistic integrity. That is what degraded in the 80s/90s when media companies became focused on profit rather than the service they provide


Was Pravda ever telling the truth?


And in this case it shouldn’t be.


I hope the family successfully destroys the finances of the people involved in these super racist decisions.
Because most disagree that it isn’t real. Aetheism is by no means a common outlook