I can’t stand her voice.
Now post one without the shirt to be distro-agnostic.
But the arch users told me it never breaks, could they have lied to me?
You don’t need timeshift because arch never breaks.
Source: arch users
Sure, go ahead, use licenses that let Apple steal everything later.
Without the 1:1 compatibility, it makes me wonder if there’s much use case for this over CentOS Stream while it lasts.
Fixed that for you. IBM Hat is just bidding its time, doing damage control, waiting for their shills to become louder than their haters, then CentOS Stream will die.
Not 100%, it’s not very hard to push packages to Flathub.
Canonical is a disgrace.
Canonical is a disgrace.
but maybe somebody knows a clever way to handle this?
backups
When a package is not working well, the distribution is said to be broken, at least for that package. This is the Debian definition.
The arch definition is “it’s not arch’s fault lmao”
He said “some of them”, meaning not all packages that broke were -git.
But some packages did
So Arch broke for you.
But some packages did
So Arch broke for you.
Only Silverblue but sadly it’s Fedora which is owned by Red Hat.
I was on Silverblue but I’m on Debian now with the same workflow, minimal kde-plasma-packages install with everything as flatpaks.
NixOS is style over substance, there is absolutely 0 reason to come with a whole new language for this and Guix is proof of that.
NixOS’ entire project is like this, they make things harder for no other reason than “it looks cooler this way”.
But I was told by the fanboys that Arch never breaks. Could they have lied to me?
But I was told by the fanboys that Arch never breaks. Could they have lied to me?
Debian.