Do electrical engineer with renewable or environmental focus and you’ll have a more even ratio.
Do electrical engineer with renewable or environmental focus and you’ll have a more even ratio.
Time to introduce the guillotine then
I instinctively closed your comment after reading “short attention span” because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.
You both agree on the problem, it’s just big and encompasses all both of you said. Using the term “unhoused people” just shifts the narrative to “we just need to put them in houses”, be that new government funded housing projects, or changing regulations to dissalow empty houses, or stopping short term rental from eating central houses in cities.
Damn autocorrect striking again.
At least he posted on the right community.
“THE” weekend, singular.
End (noun) 3. “The point in time when an action, event, or phenomenon ceases or is completed; the conclusion.”
The santanic church 🙃
Also yes
Humans can still be a cancer without killing them all. We can CURE cancer cells (maybe in the future). We can MANAGE cancer cells, stopping their destructive appetite for more and more energy (uncontrolled capitalism). Opting for killing the worst of them, but not all + the host. We can PREVENT spread of cancer to other cells (countries), stopping the opportunity of the cancer to live in the future. Eventually the cancer will die out a natural death.
Cancerous might be a hyperbole of our built in greed though. Humankind is a pest on the planet though. We consume too much and adapt our surroundings to us, not us adapting to our surroundings.
Shaveing them is an option. I (30M) just did for my legs. Fuck societal norms, do what you feel is right for you.
Looking for an invite. Will forward to 10 others in this post if it will allow me
I’m an autistic guy, but I feel I would be your type. Good to know that NTs /want/ that.
I’m an autistic guy, but I feel I would be your type. Good to know that NTs want that.
As someone else said above, it is hard to calculate exactly how much they gained.
Instead using a set % of revenue would be simpler. If enough companies do it, raise the %. If someone repeatedly does it relative to others, raise the % for them on each repeated case.
That way it is simple, but still scalable and adjustable.
Similarly, scale it down if it disproportionate to how much is saved by breaking the law, or how much it hurts the society , to ensure it is a just punishment, and not a tool for big corporations to hurt smaller ones etc.
Assuming the water is still (lake etc) at the top, they will have the same power. The energy you get from the water is the height times weight, and since each mill has the same height for water to fall, they will produce the same.
If you removed all the ones in the middle, then the bottom one would have more power than the top one as the water would fall from higher up building up speed.
And for some reason they are always relatable :/
I’ve started just staring blankly at then without saying anything until they either tell me what was funny or they move on and I go back to what I was doing. Either way, I don’t ask, it’s up to them to tell me if they want to or not. They’ll quickly learn I don’t ask, so they just start saying it naturally instead.
Had nothing to do with race or media. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
You can’t do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.