Personally I’ve heard of 3 other “Foxes”; Waterfox, Ironfox & Librefox. Anyone know the differences between these & the use cases? I’ve been wanting to switch off Firefox to something more privacy-focused and this has given me a good push to do so.
Soulseek is very easy to use. Been using it for over a year now. Not sure how it’s not more popular as I’ve been able to find lossless versions of just about everything. Highly recommend.
My experience with Lidarr (tried it after they fixed their DB problem) has been pretty poor, and doesn’t seem to download music into album folders for some reason.
From what I’ve seen they’re only adding ways to use AI more efficiently from the browser, it’s not like they’re developing their own AI, or forcing anyone to use it. It’s not even an obvious feature either, and you need to set it up with an existing AI service.
So on the AI enshittification scale, I’d rank Mozilla pretty low (unless there’s something I’m unaware of)
I thought if you enable DAITA, you can either connect to a DAITA-Enabled server, or if you don’t, it’ll automatically multihop to a DAITA server. For speed I think you’d want to go straight for the DAITA but I’m fairly certain you can do both if multihopping is ideal.
Dominant personalities and work styles almost always make it up to management.
It’d probably be more beneficial to read the article directly from Anna’s Archive where they display plenty of graphs and infographics to make the data understandable. Unfortunately this article has none of that. The “over-focus on popular artists” is quite literally meaning they’re only missing artists who aren’t being listened to, most of which are probably AI anyway.
https://annas-archive.li/blog/backing-up-spotify.html