I like the first one. The second might require a little more processing power than Trumpers typically have at their disposal.
I like the first one. The second might require a little more processing power than Trumpers typically have at their disposal.
First, have they ever presented good evidence of anything?
Second, who would they present it to? There’s no governmental agency or regulatory body in charge of disqualifying for insurrection. The only precedent we have for this is Confederates trying to run for office after the civil war, but that precedent got botched.
10/10 condescending attitude tho
Looks weird from my side too, when someone starts frothing at the mouth about monopolies when steam is so much as mentioned.
Sponsored results make me irrationally angry and push me to Kagi every time I see them.
Obligatory This show is the best trek we’ve had in decades.
Didn’t a solar flare just hit us today? I assume that’s the reason
Ah yes, I’m sure Kim Jong Un attends his local Baptist Church every Sunday like a good fascist.
I kind of thought half the reason for the class based system was to appeal to specific fantasies/wish fulfillments, though. My first thought concerning this problem is that maybe they’re playing the wrong caster class, different classes exist for different fantasies.
It’s my personal belief that the mechanics of the caster classes don’t lend themselves well to the fantasy of it.
You are correct, I too tend to humanize LLMs to some degree.
FYI the only source listed anywhere in the article is Bard itself. This journalist seems to just interview an LLM and take the outputs as fact.
Public service announcement: this article seems to be written like their only source was asking Bard some questions. If you trust Bard enough to tell you Google’s plans, you may as well be asking it when the second coming is happening, because it’ll be just as confident when it hallucinates that answer too.
LMAO I opened the link expecting an article, and I got a steady flow of quotations, but nothing to indicate who is being quoted. At the very end, the sentence “For its part, Bard states…” is used, and I can think of no clearer way to display your fundamental misunderstanding of AI. Bard can’t “state” shit in any official capacity. Bard is the same caliber of LLM as GPT, and both have a documented tendency to hallucinate.
Then where is the negotiation? The surgical strikes done only when they know exactly where the terrorist is? Where is the care for the former hostages that survive the encounter? The days-long standoff, where no action is taken for fear of killing Innocents? If the IDF were so good at it, why are they doing nothing we’ve come to expect of a professional anti-terror team? What of the harassment of even the people fleeing Gaza? How is that not anything less than genocide? They should be better than this, and you should too.
Even if Hamas was lying about there being some of their number present at a given airstrike, how many Palestinian lives are worth sacrificing to hit one Hamas?
Every time a terrorist or nut job takes a building full of innocents hostage in nearly any other society, people who are trained to minimize casualties are brought in. With the way the IDF is handling their invasion, they would more likely bomb a building because there might be a terrorist, and that’s giving them a significant benefit of the doubt that they aren’t just explicitly killing innocent Gazans.
Honestly, if you didn’t enjoy the first hour of RDR2, it might not be the game for you. I’m a strong believer that not every game should appeal to every player, and RDR2 really knows who it tries to sell itself to.
I played that game all of ten hours. Three of which involved a rando I met guiding me through his route to acquiring a horse early. Got to parade that shit to all my friends when we played next. 10/10 wouldn’t play again.
I mean, I generally agree with your assessment, but elite dangerous? I love Elite, but it is not a good game. Best thing to come from Elite Dangerous is the community.