• 22 Posts
  • 444 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • mods are elected by the users who generate the highest upvoted content in a community.

    I don’t think this is a good idea. I’d encourage you to look at my comment history in this community specifically. Every comment I’ve left in my official capacity is a direct result of at least one user report. I prefer a very light touch moderation style, where I address rule breaking content when reported but otherwise let the community manage itself.

    Those comments I left are not terribly popular, and I think that’s the heart of the problem. Running a community effectively and maintaining some sense of order is not generally a very popular activity. Do we really want to make moderation a popularity contest? Beyond that, I don’t post much in fediverse, does that mean I’m ill suited to being a mod here? I don’t think so.

    I agree in general that poor moderation can be a problem, but letting the most popular posters run the community doesn’t seem like the fix.














  • Ok folks, this is the third report I’ve gotten about these kinds of posts, so let me address this in a pin.

    I know we have a rabid anti-ai crowd here, and while that’s not my view, I respect yours and you are allowed to feel any way you’d like about AI projects posted here and say what you’d like as well, as long as you stay respectful.

    The reports I keep getting are:

    this content needs AI flair, it’s required.

    I’m gonna need some help understanding this one. I’ve read the sidebar (I helped write it after all), and I’ve read the Lemmy.world rules in general. There is no mention of that “requirement”, and further, how the hell do you flair a post?!

    I’m always happy to find out I’m the idiot and misinformed, so mystery reporter, please feel free to enlighten me here or in DM. In the meantime though, I don’t want to receive AI content reports here. If it’s on topic, it’s staying.