I’m saying no. I could find nothing on the books that prohibits specific printer tech or mandates hidden tracing be added for it to be legal.

Using the tool for illegal activities is illegal, owning a printer capable of producing fake notes isn’t.

Where are you seeing that it’s illegal? I own a pen plotter that can print things without tracking dots and that’s not illegal. I don’t see why this would be any different.

I’ve been here for a couple of years now and have never gotten anything like that. I even occasionally ban people (which I can’t imagine they are too happy about). 🤷‍♂️

Worthwhile, but wrong community.

I’m super curious to read the license and understand how this is allowed:

• Run your own version of server modules for testing or experimentation
• Make (and sell) a game similar to BitCraft with your own IP (art and themes) using our code as a basis

But what you quoted isn’t.

We’re talking about a government sponsored surveillance operation. I promise you they already know which license plates belong to you. I’m not sure I understand the risk here.

I don’t think this is correct.

• I did a few reverse image searches and found this image, but couldn’t really find any attribution. The timestamps on the results I found were quite old. Pretty sure this isn’t AI.

• there’s a clearly visible Coca Cola bottle shown attached to the gas price sign. This style of bottle wasn’t produced until 1977. https://www.historyoasis.com/post/coca-cola-bottle-design-history

• for gas to be 22 cents, this would need to be pre-1950’s. In 1977, gas was around $0.60 on average. https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/fact-741-august-20-2012-historical-gasoline-prices-1929-2011

I’m pretty sure this is a modern image and the price shown is $2.11 (and 9/10’s of a cent).

Edit: I’m just seeing what community I’m posting it, but I’m leaving this comment.

This is not entirely accurate.

If you clam up pre-Miranda warning, it can be used against you (if you didn’t specifically exercise your rights).

Case law about this: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/570/178/

Post-Miranda warning, there’s no issue. The warning literally advises you of your right to be silent.

You can’t park there sir.

And it’s a blast to shoot…at $0.50 a round.

Found my 2026 project.

Fuck Musk, but fuck this bullshit even more.

Does this make sense?

No.

Literally all of us are shitting right this moment.

I registered a domain and wrote an article to try to get a submission through. It worked for a few months, but was removed after that. Very vigilant.

Well yes, those are the rules. But if I see someone ripping out invasives themselves…

I didn’t see it.

I’m from the states and I took this as “national park” (or perhaps state) land. It’s land intended for ecological conservation.

I think the general idea is that you shouldn’t mess with conservation land. The general public isn’t educated enough to know what is invasive and what isn’t, so the rules say don’t disturb stuff. But if someone who was educated was in the park removing invasive species, they are almost certainly “breaking the rules”, but doing a net positive thing.

So if you see it…you didn’t.