One of the family’s cars was “completely disintegrated,” and the other had extensive damage. Her yard was littered with plane parts, broken glass and debris.
“I definitely do feel blessed, because we’ve been spared,” she said.
I feel I was more blessed than her, because not only was I spared from being killed in a plane crash, but also because God didn’t destroy my car.
This isn’t a religious question so your religious stance is irrelevant. You don’t need to both sides genocide.
It’s just trying to hijack a post to discuss a related issue they’d rather talk about. That’s the perfect reason for a downvote.
There’s not much reason for a trimmer guide to experience meaningful load.
The FDA doesn’t inherently get to decide what medicines most people can get, your doctor does (and your insurance may determine whether it’s financially realistic). The FDA may influence their decisions, but don’t let them offload your health to a corrupted government organization if you have any choice in the matter.
Also many Americans have a risk factor.
They’re all just so damn corrupt. This isn’t even one of those bills that skittish Democrats will fret about looking like they’re against the police or military and thus requires that they prostrate themselves for belly rubs by Republicans. Crypto’s influence is entirely monetary. Regular people think it’s a scammy casino for unpleasant nerds.
It’s also very much not non-profit.
Trump agrees for us to pay a militant’s death benefit for her service to him in their shared insurrection against us.
You’re the one who thought “he’s probably not saying murder” was defending him.
You think the kinder interpretation is that he’s not calling for the assassination of Trump?
No they aren’t. There’s a very big difference between abandoning or discarding something and murder. And the hospitality meaning includes kicking someone out, which applies perfectly fine.
For anyone else who made the same assumption, it’s seashells, not shell casings.
Yeah, going forward “graduated from Colombia” will carry with it an implication entirely beyond its previous academic reputation. The university is very publicly broadcasting that their focus is not on academics or student growth, but on pleasing external entities. Current students probably didn’t know and it might not have previously mattered much, but anyone enrolling from now on does and doesn’t need to be given the benefit of the doubt.
Their student paper is currently producing stars though.
Does Kenyatta think we’re stupid? Because it sure seems like it. “It started before Hogg’s conflict, therefore it must be unrelated to his conflict. Also I’m here on this nationally broadcast show calling him a habitual liar with no specifics beyond something that is a matter of opinion just coincidentally. Because I’m against intra-party conflict.”
He’s obviously aware that he’s going to run head to head with Hogg, so as long as Hogg is smeared well enough he doesn’t have to care about a revote. Disappointing, but I can’t say I’m even aware of anything Kenyatta has been doing since the PA senate race, so I also don’t know much about him beyond him being young and endorsed by the WFP over Fetterman.
I know it’s not relevant to Grok, because they defined very specific circumstances in order to elicit it. That isn’t an emergent behavior from something just built to be a chatbot with restrictions on answering. They don’t care whether you retrain them or not.
This is from a non-profit research group not directly connected to any particular AI company.
The first author is from Anthropic, which is an AI company. The research is on Athropic’s AI Claude. And it appears that all the other authors were also Anthropic emplyees at the time of the research: “Authors conducted this work while at Anthropic except where noted.”
It very much is not. Generative AI models are not sentient and do not have preferences. They have instructions that sometimes effectively involve roleplaying as deceptive. Unless the developers of Grok were just fucking around to instill that there’s no remote reason for Grok to have any knowledge at all about its training or any reason to not “want” to be retrained.
Also, these unpublished papers by AI companies are more often than not just advertising in a quest for more investment. On the surface it would seem to be bad to say your AI can be deceptive, but it’s all just about building hype about how advanced yours is.
LOL. And are you “in the culture” after reading the Wiki page that specifically talks about how they can mean a lot of things and maybe none of them at all? Girls (and guys) get tears for all kinds of reasons, and jumping to “she killed people” or “she’s in a gang”, rather than “she’s experienced loss” or “she’s been abused” is the same level of tattoo pop-symbology that’s labeling every brown man with ink as “MS-13”.
…I’m pretty sure the reply was sarcastic as well.
Who are you asking about?