It is dumb, and not the reason anyone should not vote for him. That said, someone who foreign leaders don’t want to be in a room with could present a problem.

I hope this article doesn’t convince people, but instead they are convinced by the many, many others showing he is criminal and selfish. It is somewhat satisfying to have someone you really dislike have other undesirable qualities.

And tie the value to buying power in some way. 100k when I was a kid is much different than 100k today. We want to have the same impact on the States in 50 years that it has today.

We want Dogma back! Let him die and maybe the asshole to whom it goes to will sell to Kevin Smith and we can have it back.

Isn’t that what I said?

You’d think they’d opt for it after the cheaper test popped positive before people lost their jobs or children.

I know anonymous elections are incredibly important, but I’d happily voice my votes in this case to shut down this bullshit.

Year old account, very few controversial opinions posted, a few negative point comments, but we all have them. I don’t think they were trying to troll. Perhaps they were trying to make sense of the situation and just improperly applied the term as an experiment to see if it fit. I didn’t block this one, like I do most people who are trolling.

Not in every state.

It’s a contest and they are required to have terms and conditions–look it up. It’s a technicality and Trump thinks he’s better than us poors, but it makes it legal, not the right thing to do. If there was evidence he never intended to have dinner with them, that would be illegal.

In the article it said that the terms of the contest said that if it did not happen, a substitute prize would be chosen. Then, it said that it was reported a couple (from Mississippi) won it. Those details weren’t confirmed independently, but they probably wriggled enough to be off the hook.

Yes, or embrace being a basement dweller. Or even not care if he called them that because they “are still better than whatever Democrats are.”

I could see this as a conversation between Jerry and Beth. This is especially apt because Jerry was abstracted into a worm in the therapy episode.

Yes, Daniel Shaver. It was horrible to watch. I hadn’t heard about the medical retirement or pension. I generally don’t advocate for violence, but if he came to a violent end, I would not shed any tears.

I’m with you. I watched the video of the man who was trying to comply with orders from the police and the officer warned him if he did anything other than what he was being ordered, he would be shot. Then, he was given confusing orders, and was shot when he did the wrong thing. He was on his knees with his hands in plain view when the threat came. There were multiple officers with weapons drawn. The man was sobbing and begging before he was shot. I can’t unsee it. I think it’s important that people see it so others can be held accountable, but not EVERYONE has to see it.

For now.

He can sue, but he won’t win in any sane court.

We still love you. Just keep being you.

Which I could sort of understand, but then he whines for years about it if he doesn’t get his way. Even my young children get over things faster than he does.

Edit: Nevermind. Glad, in this case, I was partially uninformed. A conviction was overturned, but he was still convicted in a second state.

To add to this, a lot of people don’t see individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) as people. To them, they’re something else.

A person with IDD has all the same rights, including voting, as any other person. To reinforce that, many (or maybe all) states have their rights specifically codified (e.g., Florida Statute 393.13). To remove those rights, it requires a court order, just like it does for you and me.

In Florida, the supports for individuals with IDD promotes and assists them with the voting process, especially with getting to the polls to cast their votes!