ferret

You don’t need a lens, just a differently shaped mirror. Their point is just that the light you capture is based on the mirror’s surface area, so if you are selling sunlight-equivalent amounts of light you would need a mirror of equal area to that you are selling. You would not need such a large mirror to sell an area of dimmer light, and you would not need a lens.

Holy hell

It’s extra wasted space because compression artifacts are hard to compress lossless. It’s a shit sandwich, so people advise against it.

Where have you heard that? The whole reason jack exists is professional audio

Ancient egyptians didn’t speak english

Alt-tabbing to another application (e.g. web browser) should not force you to close the game

Wsl is just a vm

Context for people scrolling by: the taiwanese law enforcement agency responsible for the raid released a diagram of how IPTV piracy operations function that included the cloudflare logo prominently in one of the steps.

This question backs all of modern archeology

Modern society has existed in a flash on an evolutionary timescale, it’s likely that our ancient ancestors were exactly as “smart” as we are

I am not sure I understand, OP is clearly misinterpreting the text they quote

Wayland is the default on blender, that is what that text says

But if you can get around the signing requirements, it would be trivial to make the psp firmware only do that. (Probably not trivial, but at least technically feasable)

I bet we can do it in three.

As energy costs decrease, so does the biggest expense in electrolysis

Nasa should not have to contend with budget cuts.

If you want to remote into the linux box, I recommend sunshine+moonlight. They are designed for “gamuurz” but that just means they are efficient.

This is an odd take. There is no inherent advantage to using an unfamiliar ui on linux, there is nothing under the hood that “works better” for any specific desktop environment

Alternative is like… a single gigabyte of local storage on these things

I don’t think this is a bad question at all, personally I would prefer to mount the drive once and symlink folders for a couple reasons:

1. It’s easier to automate
2. it’s theoretically faster (to initialize) as symlinks are effectively free
3. I personally like symlink syntax more than mount syntax :P

One possible con to symlinks is that certain (linux native) software can misbehave when it has to interact with them, but this is a fairly uncommon issue. Stuff ran through wine or proton should support them just fine, as they are abstracted away.