![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
There’s a difference between bombing somebody and not serving somebody
There’s a difference between bombing somebody and not serving somebody
I think you messed up the link formatting :)
~70% of software developers were using copilot or a similar AI assistant
That’s interesting, do you have a source?
Yes, we absolutely should have blamed the pilots for the Boeing crashes.
Right. I see there’s no logical discussion to be had here. Have a good day.
My question was very simple and limited in scope:
Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?
I did not make any sweeping comments, and I would appreciate if you stopped trying to claim things on my behalf.
Fuck knows. It’s not like I made any such claim, you just decided to put up a strawman argument.
Since when could someone do this … with a couple of clicks and zero training, for free and on any device?
You know, somebody probably said the exact same thing about Photoshop when it first came out? Back when cutting up photos and pasting them together was a thing. Then again, somebody probably said the same thing about the advent of photography too, during the days of woodcuts and oil paintings.
Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?
?
Of the numerous articles I’ve posted thus far, exactly ONE series (about the Supreme Court scandal) could reasonably be said to directly concern US politics.
Props for having an open mind!
That’s easy for you to say when you’re not the one headed to jail
She wasn’t placed in solitary for breaking the rule, that’s a fairly common rule to break. She was placed in solitary for resisting the transfer.
What are they gonna do that they’re not already trying to do? Revolt? Subvert the rule of law? Shoot up some schools?
Well, let them? The people who would take it seriously and get worked up about it are the ones who are in support of this stupid law in the first place.
Are we then supposed to lower the standard of all writing to the lowest common denominator, then? I get your point, but I’m not sure the solution is to move to grade school levels of communication.
Dude, it’s tongue in cheek. It’s meant to be funny. Even if you don’t find it so, it very obviously wasn’t meant to be taken seriously
Isn’t that an argument for blaming them? Their govt is ducked and they can’t be bothered to vote