![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Yes, all of that, but also the supply of new housing never recovered from 2008 (when all the hedge funds went into buying existing houses versus risking money on new builds).
We need both.
Yes, all of that, but also the supply of new housing never recovered from 2008 (when all the hedge funds went into buying existing houses versus risking money on new builds).
We need both.
Only PETE and HDPE are truly recyclable (resin maker 1 and 2 (the “recycle triangle” on the plastic)). Every other plastic is either impossible to recycle from jump, or degrades every time it’s recycled. I don’t think “any new” plastic fits the reality.
Having read the article and then the actual report from the Sakana team. Essentially, they’re letting their LLM perform research by allowing it to modify itself. The increased timeouts and self-referential calls appear to be the LLM trying to get around the research team’s guardrails on it. Not because it’s become aware or anything like that, but because its code was timing out and that was the least effort way to beat the timeout. It does handily prove that LLMs shouldn’t be the one steering any code base, because they don’t give a shit about parameters or requirements. And giving an LLM the ability to modify its own code will lead to disaster in any setting that isn’t highly controlled like this.
Listen, I’ve been saying for a while that LLMs are a dead end towards any useful AI, and the fact that an AI Research team has turned to an LLM to try and find more avenues to explore feels like the nail in that coffin.
He should just predict basketball or what ever and leave politics to the adults that he hired.
And say Walz is a failure at every turn. Seriously, we’re not beyond the culture war, Walz and the DFL just stopped shooting themselves in the feet.
deleted by creator
DC case. It’s the second line in the article
Which is why the title says extant feline, not species.
Fifth Circuit openly wonders where are the sharks with laser beams?
It’s semi-autonomous, not remote controlled
No, it isn’t. Whataboutism is pointing to a different wrong as a way to dismiss a currently discussed wrong. This is using someone’s past actions as a reason they shouldn’t be trusted in their current statement. It’s a legitimate attack on the speaker’s ethos.
Don’t bring attention to their privilege! They just want to go back to being blissfully ignorant! /s
Can you share the source of these vote totals? Would love to share this, but need the source to verify.
Gods I wish. The offsets program is mostly green-washing. Relevant Climate Town video
I mean, it’s his campaign’s decision to hold these giant open air rallies in unsecured locations. So… shrug
Yeah, because the media needs the barest amount of plausible deniability, obviously
Systemic issue, California is just showing the rot stronger than other places. It’s a growing issue for the whole country.
More of this GDP growth is captured by the 1% every year. We need progressive policies to reduce inequality before the wealth gap bubble collapses.
No antisemitism to be seen. The same people is referencing people who think they can buy policy and politicians, regardless of what people want. That is what’s happening here.