

You don’t have to study neuroscience to realize that higher G rollercoasters aren’t tearing people’s brains open and 4 G’s is merely average for a rollercoaster.


You don’t have to study neuroscience to realize that higher G rollercoasters aren’t tearing people’s brains open and 4 G’s is merely average for a rollercoaster.


Brain injuries from what? It’s been established that 4 G’s can’t cause brain-bleeds. 4 G’s is average for a rollercoaster. Some even go up to 6 yet these 6 G rollercoasters aren’t causing brain-bleeds.
Keyword here is “allege”.


I bought 4 G’s up since the articles are trying to spin it as the G forces causing the deaths. In reality, the X2 at 4 G’s falls in the median for peak G forces in terms of rollercoasters.


No, the lawsuits are indeed saying the G forces are exploding their brains.


When you look at it from a scientific perspective, 4 G is average for a rollercoaster. And 4 G’s is not even close to being powerful enough to tear people’s brains apart. To say I’m skeptical these lawsuits are being 100% truthful would be an understatement. I’ve ridden the X2 plenty of times.
Then what is? Because the articles mention it’s the G-forces. And the X2 does not feature any prominent negative G’s. Additionally, modern roller coaster safety standards cap negative forces near a brief -1.5 G to -2.0 G peak.