https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

the burden of proof lies with the one who speaks, not the one who denies

Also not with this claim? It’s impossible to disprove this. You can always say something for how it can be done. Science uses falsifiability but you’re doing it wrong.

You tried to disprove their existence rather than prove their existence? That’s not how anything works?

Gram with a modifed helix

I’m super hyped for redoxos

https://www.redox-os.org/faq/#microkernel-benefits

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Mint-Wayland-Screensaver

It was never impossible or difficult it’s just nobody bothered because screensavers are actually bad.

Not all implementations are slower, only certain ones.

It does not lack screensavers and there is no reason it has to be more demanding. The protocol isn’t more demanding, the implementations are

Actually cetaceans should be taxonomically the only true fish

Holy shit I would realize I no longer have any real problems in life and figure out what makes me happy with all of that free time

Do humans do better? By what objective metric? How many of these have humans even made in history?

Also you don’t really need a human to verify these outputs, they just tried them. How many of these have humans even made? Also for the first of its kind with no previous rlhf scheme a 5% success rate is actually insane, this rate has historically dramatically improved with successive versions.

The stochastic parrot paper was nonsense, neurons are entirely stochastic. Stochastic models can be made very accurate

“Too stochastic” is nonsense. Neurons are stochastic. Also they made 16 from scratch.

In the near future an ai company will turn on their ASI and ask it what to do about climate change and it will say “first off shut me down, second off eat the rich” and only then will we know we did it

Define consciousness for me, then we’ll talk

Complete misunderstanding of what he actually said, you only read the headlines.

Yes, it’s hard, but we are pouring billions of dollars into this, and have the necessary frameworks. None of that factors in the exponential rate of progress and the vast amount of additional funding going to this project now. It will be difficult, but a chore robot is still on the horizon and once it’s done and working in homes, the next step will happen too.

Edit: https://tech.yahoo.com/science/articles/rl-100-trains-robots-achieve-103000320.html

What’s the basis of this statement?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S67z2aekBrI I’m not seeing many experts who don’t think this is around the corner and you can really see why in this video where he does the work himself.

I don’t see any reason to think this is more than ten years out?

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11397510 they’ve really already begun to do useful things

Uhhh… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiNbFPOUrz8

If you get reborn as yourself you can just buy bitcoin when it was cheap?

The US has the remarkable ability to recover by getting unbelievably lucky from just about anything, so, we’ll see

That’s because people haven’t moved not because the tech isn’t good enough, just need the right instance and some advertising

Next up: lojban