• 1 Post
  • 16 Comments
Joined 7 days ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2025

help-circle





  • This is a good moral compromise in that it allows you to enjoy the art without the moral complications of commercially supporting a rapist, but I think some people might argue that it doesn’t go far enough and that we should essentially culturally boycott the art as well, that an artist’s reputation rests partially on how their art is perceived, and by continuing to enjoy that art and share it with others, you continue to support the artist in some sense.

    Not sure I know how I feel about that argument, but I think it’s an intuition some folks have or an argument they make.



  • I think my cognitive dissonance was too strong, I got rid of my Gaiman. :-(

    But I feel you - his works were important in my life before, I’ve just been downsizing and even though it wasn’t the best, I decided to get rid of mine (not because it’s “right” but just because I don’t like being reminded of him).


  • dandelion@piefed.blahaj.zoneOPto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule away Rowling
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    this is actually the main sadness I have re Gaiman, I never finished the Sandman series and I just never will now.

    I know there’s plenty to be said about separating the work of art from the moral judgement of the artist, but tbh it’s just like a taboo, psychologically the association turns me off whether there is a rational justification for it or not.





  • dandelion@piefed.blahaj.zoneOPto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule away Rowling
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I wonder if there is any real relationship between influence and immorality, or if it’s just a salience error (those with influence are more likely to be scrutinized and immorality brought to everyone’s attention, and we just don’t notice the people who aren’t a problem while we do notice those who are).