It’s pretty scary that these people were in such leading positions, with the USAID person even promoting her moronic ideology even abroad.
That said, the part calling calling out “pro-choice” as a term feels semi-true to me. Of course, that language is as much appeasement as it is a specific framing. And “pro-life” as the opposite term is at least as dumb because quite often it will lead to mothers being physically and mentally hurt or even death of the mother. Also, I do love the irony of women trying to take rights away from themselves.
There are no FOSS payment methods. In fact, you’re probably lucky to find a payment processor that will handle FOSS stuff at all.
In our estimations of what will be served … we believe we will attain this 50 percent plastic single-use plastic reduction," said Grenon.
The bottles poured into cups would not count towards this target, she added.
Everybody loves a good KPI.
I was reluctant to watch because Jordan Petersen. Hence my admittedly uninformed comment. :)
I was confused why anyone would attempt to convince this shill. But scrolling through the timeline, I see it’s apparently a mistitled debunking video. Which is fair.
Pretty sure this has nothing to do with the new “conservative” NZ government either.
“We need to fly more, not less [for climate]” – EasyJet CEO Johan Lundgren (source, German)
He really should just drop out now that he has nothing to prove to Biden.
Comparing himself to Biden is a side quest only, he really wants power.
It didn’t seem to be. The page even had this text in a box at the end:
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. […]
As a corollary: Don’t buy into specific vintage fads like “branded 80’s sportswear” – there’s a very limited quantity of these and there are fakes going around, that have none of the sustainability cred either.
A man of the people, chatting with one of the people.
Eh. Biden can just go out and have 4 of the 9 Supreme Court judges killed institutionalized, right?
Why all the downvotes? I admit, the piece takes a very negative view, the bit about Gaza may be a bit of a distraction (from an environmental pov), and also the piece may be damaging to the Democratic bid for the presidency. But overall, it appears to be based in fact.