That is going to look so stupid later. Because of how high profile OpenAI news will dig in and write about the sister stuff even if it isn’t really the sole reason Sam got fired. It will be perceived as a weird choice to also quit with that context
It all seems vague as hell until some NYTimes/Wapo/WSJ journalist helps parse it all out and writes a clear coherent article about that, also the editor at those papers may not think such a story is newsworthy enough to put resources on that for month for a VC/Startup founders program head but for the CEO of the “hottest” company right now its a no brainer
How often is that being applied equally irrespective of submitters reputation. If only reviewers reviewing certain submissions apply it that seems unfair and seems to be the case where the grad student making their first submission at some no name school with the smallest compute budget is getting that acceptance criteria
It depends on your use case and the teacher I think ie is there anything to distill
Kawhi better get some kneepads because the season just started
Seems risky but if you take enough cash as comp and don’t believe any paper comp valuations at face value I would see it as a reasonable gamble if you need a job
Its worse than usual some of the explanations for ELI5 are stuff even the r/futurism folks that invade here would know