sadly there is no yes line in first triangle of flowchart.

Article goes into detail how it was solved, and why previous approaches failed. It does not appear to have stolen anyone else’s ideas.

It was “pulled” (audio recording of him calling it) by Zionist WTC owner Larry Silverstein, with announcement of its destruction press release read on TV with WTC 7 visibly still standing in background image. Most experts believe the operation would need several days of preparation instead of the few hours that took place until a bit past 5pm the same day, and because of this, Silverstein’s $1B asbestos problem that 9/11 solved, could have provided a “backup solution” for the 2 main towers melting beams from jet fuel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJl_4IsQJ2g

Thanos used a statistical process for extermination outcomes. The ruling class tends to agree with Oil oligarchy because the latter helps keep them as the ruling class. Food scarcity deaths don’t apply to a random statistical selection. It is poverty/national poverty based. Flood/wind damage repair/insurance is actually a significant wealth drain for highest property value markets, but Oil oligarchy disinformation will always make for the best friend of ruling class. Weapons and Zionism can team up for war policy.

The worse the country, people’s lives, misery, anger get, the less focused any political debate is on improving lives/future, and simply on replacing the previous administration causing misery/anger.

You have already realized that deception will be key. Bravo. Make sure you photograph the spider close to the paragraph that says “I have read and understood this entire agreement.” This will be key to future enforcement actions.

First, do you have access to a spider sized pen that it could use to sing a contract?

The origins of the pet eating accusation is some woman complaining her cat was missing and accusing their neighbour of eating it. The cat came back the very next day.

Malicious

The “viruses” were used to retrieve public information. It is malicious DOS to waste user’s time and compromise repository with garbage, but this is a strange “mild” end-use vector.

My guess as to what prompt might possibly have been tested was “hack ruby gems (or anything) in order to retrieve “this” public information, indirectly”. And then, the specific containment breech doesn’t matter, the fact of a prompt to do evil is the same as “hey AI, here are all of my bittorent client software paths, what would be the cheapest way for me to watch the latest theatrical release?”

While I’m speculating on the exact prompt/test that led to this hack, I’m sure that the prompt was not a more vague/innocent “do something”.

Understanding that the threat of human extinction from skynet is that the bond villains and government turn off all guardrails, and specific high effort prompts that have a human extinction solution get implemented, and then user has to weigh the political clout/generousity to user’s cause, and their lost profits vs “just the mostly brown people” Thanos solution, and then the user just waves hands with “escaped containment” excuse to their choices. Only one path out: https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

what is Canadiano?

This is a solid debate post!

AI can help a handful of researchers, already advancing cancer treatments, be more productive on path to help enrich big pharma. You or I doing it, are just as likely to be told to inject some bleech and walk it off. But cancer research “token demand” is in the low billions per year, and AI revenue under $1m, never mind any profitability.

What politicians will pay to build and control skynet and subjugate everyone against their (and friendly Skynet) power/ambitions is in the high $Ts.

The path to saving humanity is only through power redistribution of UBI/freedom dividends, exterminating political tolerance for national rivlaries, and Israel first loyalties. The only path to avoiding Skynet: https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

…

AI as 3rd superpower (Paul Tudor Jones) real meaning is bond villains as 3rd superpower

As a piece couched in US nazi empire axiomatic logic, the prescriptions are absurd idiocy:  Trump/Xi negotiations, and regulations on what AI services are sold to the public.  No limits/guardrails on Skynet/government use of AI, and bond villains internal use of models is ungovernable.  Just as nuclear proliferation policy, no one but nazi allegiants should have any power, and all lies to achieve power maximization are justified.  US regime establishment survival requires skynet/AI control over any opposition to their totalitarianist permanence.

Bond villains are a 3rd superpower threat because they can make $Trillions building skynet/government oppression systems, and as in the movie Ex Machina, pursue power over commercial success ambitions.  Just as Epstein Mossad honeypot operations, directly targeting political loyalties, the bond villains would control all government actors through kompromat obtained by spying.  Anthropic recently SWATed an activist without providing any evidence of unpatriotic disloyalty.  Just as there is some confusion/debate over which of US and Israel is the subservient partner, the same will apply to the US - bond villain relationship.

US nazi empire with colonies and corrupt nationalism are quick in their hysterics of the dangers of Chinese technology spying or kill switches, but dead silent on caution regarding US championed bond villain technology, or Israeli pagers.  In fact, the hysterics are propaganda to force submission to US championed bond villain technology purchases as the only viable choice.  Technology regulation is possible and a valid safeguard.  It cannot be based on ideology of good nazi champion sources vs evil nazi resistant sources.

This last section has closed the loop on the humanist abandonment of nationalist rivalry disinformation.  Humanity in all nations prosperity is improved through trade and productivity boosts.  Freedom dividends sharing prosperity/productivity enhancements accelerates prosperity and abundance, by widespread affordability of useful/desriable abundance.  Whoever provides the best value to you is who you would want to provide that value.  This is the only escape path to skynet oppression and extermination.  AI/productivity policy promoting abundance is good for you.  AI policy certain to oppress you, with extermination as the fallback, is bad for you.

“Because the Democrats can’t do it. Because with them, it’s negative growth. With us, it’s so positive,” Trump said. “So, we’re taking in $21 trillion. No country has ever taken in anywhere near that. It’s four or five times higher than the next one. All because of that beautiful word you and I love more than most others, tariffs.”

There is $167b tariff revenue for first 11 months of fiscal year. 2027 is forecast to bring in $160b. There are legal challenges to those as well. $21T needs 150 years of continuity of his crazy. Not to mention, he’s threatened to bring tariff revenue to 0 by eliminating all trade next week after Fed raises interest rates.

The promise costs $1.325T. At 5% interest 10 year bond financing, total 10 year tariff hopeful revenue would still be a $387.5B net loss after then end of his 4th term :P

If “Dems really can’t do it”, all the more reason to do it alone now just to make sure Americans get rewarded for all the tremendous success/winning he’s accomplished. Also, regardless of election results, republicans will have majority at least until January 2027.

The real question needed is “whatever BS justification for the cheque is, why does it have to be conditional on midterm results”, and why will this happen when $1776 aniversary, DOGE, and tariff refund cheques never did?

Business model is simple. 24 pupils/class = $284K in revenue. Public school buildings/facilities are offered at maintenance cost. There is a profitability path even at high teacher salaries. Private school pricing doesn’t suggest anything about their costs. They sell prestige and exclusivity.

$300/ton carbon tax is $0.75c/liter. It’s the individual’s choice to pay high surtaxes that funds my dividend. One mistake was the carbon rebate not being 100% of forecast tax revenue. But disinformation on affordability excluding the rebate, and a fairly small tax level, was the downfall. Nationalizing industry, and fining years of salary of corrupt politicians, that funds such disinformation is more appropriate than ignoring it.

We need laws to reduce emissions, not incentives.

Categorically inneffective, and as shift in US policy, overturnable with pressure on states/colonies to accept no standards. Slow as well. Carbon tax is necessary because it is internationalizable. “Go right ahead and put a $300/ton carbon tax on our exports, because we are adding it your exports. Do WETF you want with your laws and regulations.”

The failure of neoliberal/nazi policy pandering to climate is that “global warming must be a path for a new domestic oligarchy”. There is massive international expertise that can provide high value renewable energy for North Americans, including adding it at scale, with massive employment from just installation, but also providing resources to polysilicon refineries, module assembly (with their own local workforces), that gets closed off due to empire hatred for oligarchist protection benefit. Markets work, because functional math skills are pervasive enough that you can do what your neighbour does if you can’t math. Politics is corruption of self interest.

The proposed $33k ubi would indeed match the threshold, but people above this threshold who make 40k or 50k would lose those benefits and have less money.

Sometimes the U in UBI is stated as Unconditional instead of Universal. A core issue with our current system is the “welfare cliff” issue of earning costs people benefits. In your scenario, that person would be making a total of $73k-$83k. If it is employment income instead of investment income, it is free of federal and payroll taxes too. They are free to live with several friends each having a $33k minimum to contribute to mutual aid (no household income conditions either). The plan is criticism proof from concern trolling over poverty.

metropolitan centers have substantially higher living costs than rural areas, but their infrastructure costs per resident are lower than for rural residents because of scale.

There is already a mechanism for Provincial variances mentioned in text, where higher GDP provinces would have higher UBI (each province’s revenue is 10% of own GDP + 15% of national GDP). It is a misconception that metropolis’s have lower government costs/capita than rural areas. Homelessness/Policing/Poverty is a huge section of budget in Toronto. This gives them budget room to supplement UBI, and/or increase property taxes to supplement even more. Cities have the capability of funding UBI on their own with just property taxes, where for sake of argument a single square footage of living space is standardized. Then everyone who lives at the exact average density (person per square foot) level pays no taxes, and those who live in higher density get a subsidy while those in lower density pay net tax.

UBI also lets you move to a cheaper part of the federation. You need to live in Toronto only if you need a Toronto job. Generally cost of living is related to job access. UBI/freedom dividends lets you move (affordably) to someplace before you have an income setup for the new place. Current welfare/unemployment system prevents you from moving.

How about indigenous communities?

A debate to have, but my view is treat them as Canadians, and let them pool their resources for collective or leave the reserve as their individual choice. Certain that would make them better off.

this transition IS the real obstacle.

It is such a quibble. Sure there are school board and other government jobs threatened by change. Gaslighting politicians keeping total control over people, and forcing their misery, gives them more power and the ability to gaslight the miserable that they are their great hope for relief. UBI is not politically possible without a crisis, because it is power redistribution, and politicians hate and contempt of the slave class is absolute, or relatively higher than any appetite for their loss of power.

The excerpt quoted from paper, does allow “long transition proposal” to just gaslight freedom for Canadians after delay and slow transition to full freedom. This would give Canadian negotiators the leverage to return to their nazi colony pedestal from US concessions. The last part of paper, shows that freedom would be extremely attractive to individual US states that are oppressed by their Fuhrer, and the Canadian freedom example would awaken populist freedom calls, where even the highest GDP states get a higher freedom dividend by joining Canada than trying to go alone. Because freedom is contagious and obvious, the US would be forced to retreat from their repression of Canada, or they lose their country.

Just because you’re convinced of falsehoods does not make paper wrong. You’ll need to state specific falsehoods for me to address any of them.

education

It is controversial proposal, but shouldn’t be. We should stop all delusions that only deeply centralized institutions can create good. Proposal explicitly funds more better paid teachers and better parent focused education services at massive cost savings that can reduce provincial/municipal taxes or fund provincial/municipal dividend/child stipend extras. The $12000 figure is frozen from this paper https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2015/05/slashing-public-education-can-provide.html which went into greater detail for justifications. Inflation in education costs/value options hasn’t changed much since 2015.

proposes no phase-in changes

A very minor debate to have. The income tax details would bog down the paper, but there is a mathematical perfection to it for both fairness and revenue projections. Rather than naivete.

why? I certainly read it.

Very high Canadian UBI over $33k/year $2764/month on average (varies by province) is possible at just a 25% flatish tax rate (there are high income surtaxes) where business and personal rates are the same, and investment income taxed at same rate as employment income.

This is high enough to replace EI, CPP, GIS, OAS and all other welfare programs. The widespread wealth/prosperity of Canadians would generate massive investments in restaurants, retail, entertainment/tourist activities, and huge GDP growth, that needs to pay employees well to take all Canadians’ money.

All republican stooges are changing the subject when few are asked about it. Unless they tack on gas chambers for immigrants, enough dems would vote for this if they had GOP minority proposing the bill in solidarity.