Epstein’s Mossad role is also why we’re in a war with Iran. Netanyahu has video and other proof, and possibly the pee tape.

The 3 strategies if not sharing electricity is overproduction in summer used to make/sell H2 from surplus, and backup energy in winter (can come from H2/ammonia), and throttling down usage on some winter days.

That first strategy (overproduction) is helped with any size wire for export/import. Southern US has less seasonal production variation than north, but the solar sizing formula is based on maximum summer production day. (datacenter + electrolysis gw * 24) / maximum sun hours. Very heavy electrolysis permits free power for one datacenter, and high power ROI for providing power to an equal 2nd datacenter. Reason is simply that electrolysis power sink costs $300/kw, while datacenter power sink is $50k/kw.

The trick is to go much huger than your suggestion. Massive batteries support either longer H2 electrolysis use in summer, or night/duck curve electricity delivery. Unilike utility hookups, transformer capacity, solar and batteries, with Chinese supply chain that can include domestic manufacturing is a quick/solved high capacity/quick development path. Solar, batteries, electrolysis can be deployed in 100s of mw per month that match gpu installations instead of a monolitic power plant.

Some models for Nebraska and Phoenix: https://lemmy.ca/post/63402719

It’s practical, and much cheaper/quicker power, but they need to move further out, and lose the water supply for “modern” datacenters, and fiber connections require longer lines. Using more land solves all noise issues for any neighbours as well.

DOJ (Trump submissive) tried to argue that Musk/Xai should not be liable for pollution from their BS unpermitted gas turbines on wheels that have stayed longer than “temporary allowed” duration. They said national security importance of AI means that neither removal nor damages to population affected should be considered. Judged called BS, but that is what DOJ tried to do. DOJ is likely to pay for Musk/Xai defense for appeals to SCOTUS.

There are still enough vultures that can take assets from bankruptcy. In their byline, coreweave is at head of domino chain. Nvidia is at the end. It definitely would be disgraceful to sink “all our money” into protecting stock values behind skynet, but the most obvious means of propping up the bubble is for skynet project to buy all the tokens.

They’re higher than a motherfucker!

Anything except banking

Quick add AI to your bittorrent clients, and take deposits for your crypto/gambling exchanges!

Because its now called super intelligence, we have to trust it to build skynet. Before Trump, some people might have had concerns.

Rex Tillerson was Exxon CEO (still heavily invested) before taking the job. While US has always been heavily involved in creating Gulf/middle east division, US/western oil majors have always benefitted/encouraged OPEC cartel supply cuts, that tend to benefit UAE/KSA the most. So Tillerson would have needed to start hating UAE for this to happen, and I don’t remember any indication of this.

This is a very big deal. Industry largely pushed to accept this regulation. Natural gas is already worse than coal for emissions when exported accross an ocean, even when methane leakage is accepted as minimized (pipe connections are tested/replaced instead of presumed to be 0 leakage).

Natural gas prices are low despite datacenter demand, and extreme disruption of global supply, and high US export capacity utilization, because maximum drilling for oil produces a lot of “free” natural gas. Regulations in question force to capture that natural gas and use it for something. Natural gas prices would skyrocket if rules removed, increasing Americans/global heating/electricity costs significantly, and at $100/bbl oil, more oil drilling incentives are not needed.

This is more of “Global collapse is making our oil companies $100s of Bs” mission accomplished speech, but adding that more wealth needs to be transferred to them.

Hawaian pizza was “invented” in the 60s in London Ontario area.

SpaceX was first. Even bigger fraud with circumstances waived to get in early on NASDAQ indexes. It’s a much larger overspending AI money pit, and still highly inflated.

you’re advocating petty vengeance

punishing specific evil is less petty vengence than generalizing on savings accumulation choices.

While (probably) not technical fraud, there is massive accounting BS in their financial reporting. $3.6B in Sales and marketing expenses has $400B+ hidden through capitalizing free services as “customer acquisition”, but rest of it is commissions paid to GOOG/AMZN partners, and shouldn’t even be part of revenue. They also capitalize training/fine tuning costs even though 1 month release schedule for model versions make previous model version worthless.

So the big lies are “operational profit” and revenue is greater than compute costs. They will have to drop Q3 results officially before IPO, and reason they didn’t is their Q2 apparent revenue to compute cost ratio lie, also hid that they got $2.5B free rental worth from xAI as part of their circular fraud deal to rent from them temporarily at absurdly inflated prices.

the existence of billionaires is itself an abomination of a broken economic system.

the broken system is direct evil corrupting social governance. Money=speech means money= fraud, theft, terrorism, genocide. But it is the latter application of money that is evil rather than money. It is cause for liberating the evil from their money. Your view is simply dead wrong.

The only path to wealth is accumulated propensity to savings. Extremely large yacht and epstein island orgy budgets, and MC hammer entourage hookers and blow, is wealth avoidance path. These lifestyle choices are the only path to trickle down, but you might hate them too, perhaps for the one trick “billionaire haters” hate.

but with the top rate at upper-middle income. You’re basically targeting doctors and lawyers as “the wealthiest”, when they also earn next to nothing compared with actual wealthy

Progressive taxation stays, its just added to investment income (capital gains deduction no more) as well. It’s enough because its $3T additional revenue before carbon taxes. Billionaires “only” own $8T or so, and a wealth tax that applies just for them would need to be 35% of wealth every single year to raise the same amount. The $16m~ wealth level (top 1%) would need a 5% wealth tax every year to raise the same amount.

The far more important social governance objective, is distributing social revenue to people as dividends is far more helpful than raising more revenue to pay oligarchs more for more wars. The goal shouldn’t be to generate anger at a group just because they saved wealth, it should be to maximize shared prosperity.

Failure to appropriately tax wealth while taxing income alone is the fundamental cause of labour having no value in the modern economic system

Linked proposal would have 0 employment income taxes up to $100k, and 0 payroll taxes. 5% increment surtaxes on sliding scale incomes above $100k. Investment income would have base 25% tax. Taxing the income that is derived from wealth (investments) at equal rate to employment income (the 0 income tax is a gimmick based on not deducting employment expenses from employer) is both the right fairness balance, and high revenue raiser. The far greater benefit to 90% of population, overlapping the employee class, is freedom dividends. Over $36k/year in US per adult can be afforded when we stop thinking of just wealth taxes to fund a larger nazi empire by the oligarchs for the oligarchs.

Taxing investment income is a fools errand because there are a million ways for them to enrich themselves off their holdings without appearing to HAVE income, on paper.

The one big way is borrowing against investments. A $1m-$5m limit would go a long way to eliminating the loophole for ultra rich. Trusts can be taxed more. The loopholes can be fixed.

The race to the bottom in US, is based on piecemeal “populist emotional” local measures, that just as Corporate investments shop arround for biggest local tax breaks, threats of leaving when “fair tax local” proposals/policy pass is a weak attempt at not fixing anything.

Instead of taxing wealth as a principle, I do support financially zeroing out those who sponsor speech of nazi economic fraud, and zionazi theft of American prosperity. But, essentially, everyone is/should be encouraged to get as rich as they want as long as they STFU and pay their taxes instead of corrupting government to make them richer.

Wrongthink to base it on jealousy emotions. Core solution is eliminating tax breaks for investment income instead of targeting wealth, and to redistribute power through UBI (enough), and ideally liquid democracy.

https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

Nazi democracy’s problems are Oligarchy/Zionism having disproportionate influence because winners control budgets, and gift everything to their sponsors, at expense of people. Picking a losing fight with no significant consequence even if implemented is just manipulating public’s emotions instead of structurally fixing corruption.

It’s people like you that require state to have robodogs with machine gun turrets on them.

Much less debt and financial “engineering” in China, and much lower borrowing costs.

About 100 years ago

110-115 years ago. While Europe put their armies in trenches, populist revolts on same principles diverged in US and Russia. US groups believed democracy could be effective. (Russia had a revolution because they didn’t). Open question for today is whether democracy is effective.