• 54 Posts
  • 2.65K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2024

help-circle
  • Long-term the only available and viable solution is making electric vehicles more attractive (by subsidizing them, the electricity to operate them and/or punishing the purchase of ICE cars).

    Carbon tax and dividend is best/only policy not subject to political BS. $300/ton is right tax level (75c/liter gasoline). In US, that would be enough to pay each citizen/resident $4000/year with unchanged behaviour. EVs are better TCO even at $1/liter gasoline. Government/polticians doesn’t need to be involved in marketing “science benefits”, and carbon tax and dividend costs 0. Let private sector convince people how to save money with a better type of car, or let people use transit/cycling or live closer to where they need to go to. You effectively do punish behaviour that needlessly wastes fuel.

    EV subsidies incentivizes car purchases not car use. If a used gas guzzler is cheap because it is uneconomical for most people, someone who needs it for 10 miles/week of school drop off and groceries gets a cheap car that pays for minimal climate destruction it contributes to. West has tried EV incentives before. Political BS of giving incumbents $$$Bs, while establishment funds disinformation to protest against the subsidies and disruption of establishment. Human sustainability gets massive disinformation budget to condemn it.





  • While a critic might argue that’s just swapping one federal government for another, Lorusso argues that’s not the case in the US, where states have powers that Canadian provinces do not.

    States don’t have the power to secede, so it’s a hotel california situation. Health care is not under control of any state. $100k in extra debt per person = $4000+/year in interest. $3000/year per capita military spending, about to increase to $5000/year. Higher interest rates and home building costs, including O&G drilling costs due to tariffs on Canada.

    If negotiating secession with Canada, Crown land should stay with Canada or at least form a land bridge within Canada. Canadian policies would charge more for transporting Alberta exports, and reduce their energy use. Alberta secession economic optimism is based on going all in on dead ender energy without any real friends. Don’t expect keys to the store open arms invitation to being 51st state, either.



  • I’m unsure the defense industry analogy is correct, although fewer hires does matter. Instead of hires, some people (often deeply unqualified) are now building software for spec to sell to industries that might be charmed/but unqualified to judge the software. Other’s making software for their own personal productivity, with self monetization ambitions, often copying what seems useful to others. It’s unclear whether there are fewer people working on software, or just bigger monolith companies shifting engineers to take on a more entrepreneurial role. That can mean trouble for the larger software companies.

    You could (many have) make the same argument against higher level languages all these years. If no one actually knows assembler and metal networking (or GPU for that matter now) protocols, they can’t possibly make optimized/knowledgeable architecture decisions. The only people allowed to program should be compiler contributors.







  • Huawei’s clusters have close to 4x the ram as NVIDIAs, and TFLOPs is most relevant to training. Huawei has better interconnect technology than NVIDIA, but incompatible with H200s, and so for China/friends use, it’s a much better package. Price/performance of 910 vs 5090 or 6000ada is much higher at single card level. The power cost/availability in China gives them much higher potential deployment rates. Chinese cloud rates tend to be lower than the same model on US clouds.