It’s not my art. It’s how you view art in general as “disposable”.
It’s not my art. It’s how you view art in general as “disposable”.
“Disposable art” see, you’re telling on yourself about how you view art and artists. There’s a reason people aren’t a fan of this even if you’re doing it as “ethically” as possible.
That’s what I meant
That’s up for the cops courts to prove. This is a sham case. If trump said that shit he would be applauded “oh that’s just trump being trump!”
And who is openAI compensating for their work?
At least adobe is compensating creators. No other big name AI company is doing that. Anyone who uses AI to make “art” is complicit in this theft.
The rest of your argument is putting words in my mouth. Do better. AI is hot garbage and a waste of natural resources.
Don’t get me wrong I hate adobe. But. They at least got AI right. These aren’t big corporations you’re “stealing” movies from. They’re everyday people like myself who’s art is being used by AI for training against my wishes.
They’re not only losing $ they’re also having their work reproduced in a way they don’t support.
Just because it’s cents doesn’t mean it’s “no money”.
I didn’t post my artwork online just to get ripped off by AI and tech bros who see nothing wrong with stealing work from artists.
And so long as we exist under this shit ass system we shouldn’t be stealing from working class artists. It is theft.
Outraged at elections or outraged that despite decades of the football being tossed around each election, that nothing changes, and the only way to make change is via violence at this point?
Well is the ex a CEO?
Stealing from big companies like movie studios? Whatever. Stealing from the working class? Not so great. People should 1. Have the right to not have their work used as training data and 2. If they agree to be used as training data, be compensated.
Without the means to do it it’s not a threat.
The imagery used for the training data isn’t licensed to be used as such. It’s stolen.
The “art” that goes along with the writing (not the writing itself which I assume is your actual writing)
As an artist, the training data used for most of the image generators is stolen work. As in, the original artists didn’t give permission for their work to be used that way. Some aren’t stolen, such as adobe’s ai tools, which are trained on imagery that’s licensed for it.
As an American this holiday is news to me 😞
The words that go with it are fine, the AI image is a waste of energy and water, offensive to actual artists, and AI is just theft of artists work as “training” data.
This is AI garbage
It’s snowing! Therefore climate change is a demoncrap hoax!
Really dude? Really? I bet far more autists with their strong sense of justice would be on the side of the shooter than the authorities. Especially since autism usually has other health issues that often present with it so they have more first hand experience dealing with the industry.
They’re playing dumb and engaging in censorship because they don’t want copycats.