

I don’t think sharing such biased media is useful
I don’t think sharing such biased media is useful
True, I should leave it instead of fighting, but I still feel like discussing can be helpful for people stumbling on those posts later. I don’t want them to believe the opposite side just because I stopped answering
It’s really easy to be manipulated into believing what people write here is true. Most people think the same thing, and it’s vastly different from reality
I have run into some chill blåhaj people here
I mean I have met many chill lemmy.ml, lemmygrad and hexbear users. They’re just a pain when you talk about their specific topics. The same applies to blahaj users. The main issue is ada, the instance admin of blahaj
Am I weird if I like to keep my socks on?
but it’s a good thing if it happened when she was your wife (if you’re exclusive ofc)
blahaj.zone basically
Turns into an authoritarian cult. You’re either completely with them or fully against them
Living with your parents while working = being rich speedrun
who else call people virgin anyways?
thinking people use it just as ‘virgin’ is either deliberately obtuse or ignorant
That’s just what people say these days, even if it’s inaccurate. They don’t care, they just want to insult and trigger. Who is the ignorant?
all I see are green flags
I have always criticized the current system
Payment processors are just part of it. Each time similar issues arise, I’m here
The current system’s problems are not just the actions of a few. The few in question have an incredibly high market share. Crypto would fix these issues: no need for middlemen, more privacy and anonymity (for applicable cryptocurrencies), cheaper international transactions, decentralized to prevent censorship (as long as governments don’t fuck it up too much)
Not to mention your original message was about criticizing Mastercard which is a single entity, and you’re comparing that to criticizing crypto which isn’t
What isn’t essential to you could be essential to others. For many people, card payments are not essential. Emails aren’t essential. Cars or public transport aren’t essential. You’re saying something is useless based on adoption. So it is just useless until it becomes essential at an arbitrary point? So it does not prove anything
Cryptocurrency is essential to protect your online financial privacy. If you don’t care about it, that’s on you.
Let me just give it a good sniff 👃
Always good to specify, you never know
If one leaves shit stains on a chair, don’t expect them to know this
Why blame crypto instead of the specific parts of a different community? You can’t generalize a group because of the actions of a few individuals
Cryptos impact is high but not as much as many other fields, and it’s not for the love of profit, but as a necessity to protect a decentralized currency used by lots of people
Many cryptos don’t even have any environmental cost
Rincing vigenar might be useful so the chair doesn’t smell equally bad again
Like people smoking in public?
This, but hating on crypto is trendy
And then people associate crypto with scam even if that’s incorrect because they don’t know better
So it’s a people problem?
knowing trump is pissed off at many media, i’m not so sure about this
Anyways, any obviously biased media is close to useless to me