I know this is political so you might want to avoid it but I think the true main villain should be the capitalist class (it would be a cool twist if the entire game was apolitical and bam capitalism bad)
I know this is political so you might want to avoid it but I think the true main villain should be the capitalist class (it would be a cool twist if the entire game was apolitical and bam capitalism bad)
If anything at least make it GPL and ideally make Bill Gates the main villain
Arch is extremely easy to install
:3
License the game under the GPL, the game itself is a boomer shooter (using the GZDoom engine ofc) where you kill proprietary software executives and other anti-libre demons to free Linus Torvalds from the grasp of Bill Gates.
They would rather make it harder for people to access their content rather than making it easier to be a paying customer
Wheres the light rail?
Fascism and genocide is bad regardless of where it is, yes that includes China
This is a leftist community, if you don’t like it join some “progressive” Liberal community where they’re so focused on “harm reduction” that genocide becomes an acceptable tradeoff
As an Autist I also approve
JD Vance has sex with a couch and Trump is a rapist who objectifies women, they truly are a pair forged in hell.
Most countries have Capitalism but few suffer as badly as post-Regan America (except maybe post-Thatcher UK).
JD couch fucker Vance doesn’t know how to speak to normal people, what an absolute weirdo.
Well he is basically in a union with his couch, just with less working and more… Working
If anyone in charge truly cared about the economy it wouldn’t be ran by a few adult children (and yk owned by the workers)
It means less freedom for developers but has proved that it provides more freedom for users. Does MacOS have an open source version? No but ChromeOS and Android do (ChromiumOS and ASOP respectively). Even when companies make a proprietary fork of Linux they still contribute massively in terms of code, not just money.
*the capitalist ran “economy”
Because on Linux the vast majority of its users run a complete operating system under the GPL, meanwhile on FreeBSD the vast majority of people use a proprietary dirivitive. Also significantly more companies sponsor Linux and it’s not even comparable.
The closest FreeBSD has to users is its proprietary derivatives, at this point FreeBSD might as well be considered proprietary.
I’m saying that when code is open source it helps the open source ecosystem and when using open source code means contributing your modifications everyone benefits.
I was radicalized by my school teaching Fascism, then I found out they were able to do it because they’re funded by a rich former Trump offical.