I feel bad for them, which I don’t ever feel for anything in this community… this is weird.

Also fucking hilarious to post this here.

My understanding of false accepts is when it think it hears the wake word and starts recording.

Sometimes it happens when I watch TV or rarely in a normal conversation.

If this happens, what else would you expect to happen? It’s going to behave exactly as if you woke it.

Stop talking if you notice, but unless you expect a perfect wake word rate with zero mistakes there’s nothing that can be done.

Now, if Google is intentionally waking it when it knows it’s not the right word that’s another matter entirely.

Edit: I’d refuse to accept any wrong doikg as well if it’s legit false accepts. But if it was intentional, this isn’t even a slap on the wrist for them.

How the fuck is that even legal to force opt in on location.

Google has gotten in a lot of shit for not properly letting people control that before and delete histories.

Over generation is very big. I agree batteries are better, though.

We need to be able to support peak winter heating and peak summer cooling and we need to do that with excess margin.

Everything in between we have excess power, unless it’s something like hydro dams which are easy to control and aren’t a big extra cost and part of how they naturally operate.

We generally use gas peaker plants to help which we can turn off or on, but it’s more efficient to not do that, and those are expensive.

It would also make it easier to build big nuclear plants if we could manage the off peak load into batteries for the day.

Ya, the more videos that come out the worse and worse this is getting.

The first video I saw, I only heard 3 shots. I was shocked when more videos came out and it was way more than that. Like wtf.

For phones / portables, assuming it doesn’t draw more power, it would mean shorter download times, which means less battery usage.

Wireless 4k 120hz streaming from my PC to TV would be pretty sweet. I can run a cable if i really wanted… but this would be easier. It’s still more than that, but getting that would be sweet.

They have

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cnvg812n01no

Clearly once the gun was removed from the altercation, it was now safe to kill him. What if they accidentally shot the gun and it caused the shot to ricochet or they hit the ammo clip and caused those to ignite/fire.

Finding and removing the gun made it safe to proceed.

Each Cigarette Contains 1 CRISPR dose!

The things that make it harmful to people, is the things that keep people on it and drive ad revenue.

They could try to address it, but they would earn less money.

CNN has a good video of it all

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid

The CNN video shows them disarming him and it not being in the beating area when the murder happens

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid

That picture might not be that gun, but there is proof they should have a gun in their possession.

CNN has a video with multiple angles of it all

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid

You can clearly see them disarm him and remove the gun from the beating area prior to murdering him in it.

I appreciate the pause in that video to show when the gun is unholstered. With all the videos going around and they move so fast it was hard to see but that makes it super clear.

You gotta be a monster for that to make any difference for yourself.

That’s a fantastic deal, but uh, no deal is gonna work.

holy shit, thank you for sharing that.

New Memo Dated Sunday Jan 25th.

We disagree with the judges ruling, and still think our administrative warrants allow us to enter a house. Carry on.

Okay I got home and saw the video now. That’s fucking insane and straight up murder. Like why did they even shoot multiple times after the first shot, he was laying on the ground wtf.

Edit: Also same with with the Ross murder. That first shot, maybe he thought he was in danger even though he literally put himself in that danger through incompetence, but then he shoots her twice more when no longer in danger. The same thing happened here. I can’t tell what happened in that first shot, but the next shots, he was on the ground and no danger. Are they taught to triple shoot people if they shoot or something like wtf. Like leave no survivors?

Edit: Seen some other videos now, guess it was more than just the 3 shots I heard in the first one, fucking bonkers.