

There is ONE SINGLE SUBJECT, and yes, you are dancing around your dishonest edit.
There is ONE SINGLE SUBJECT, and yes, you are dancing around your dishonest edit.
…and even those are likely pre-ElonSeigHeil purchases.
Look at you jumping to conclusions!
I’ve had one single point my entire interaction with you, and that is for you to be honest about your dishonest edited Sanders video. You’ve decided that pointing out your lie in your edit somehow is supporting genocide. You should go to the next Olympic games. I’m confident you would win gold in Mental Gymnastics.
Nope, thats not how this works. You don’t get to demand anything of me when you haven’t even answered my question. I’ve watched one of your videos already where you did a dishonest edit. Why are you so afraid to use your own words?
At the time, Dr. Steven Hotze, the sole trustee and beneficiary of the Braidwood Management company, said he was unwilling to pay for PrEP or STI screenings for his employees. “They are consequences of a patient’s choice to engage in drug use, prostitution, homosexual conduct, or sexual promiscuity – all of which are contrary to Dr. Hotze’s sincere religious beliefs,” the complaint read.
How about rape, Mr Hotze? Do patients that contract STIs when they are the victims of rape deserve to just suffer even more with STIs after their attack? How about the victims loved ones? Do you expect them to shun the victims of rape if they contracted an STI from it?
What they are worth is what someone is willing to pay for it, not what Tesla prices it at.
They aren’t selling: Cybertruck Isn’t Selling So Tesla Shifts Production To What Actually Sells
Even Tesla doesn’t want them and refuses them as trade-ins but will take other cars so its not a problem with trade-ins in general: Tesla Is So Cooked That It’s Now Refusing to Accept Cybertrucks as Trade-Ins
but that’s no reason to completely ruin this
girl’sguy’s life, she’s already paying for college…
We agree on this.
Wrong about you editing the Sanders clip to make it dishonest? I ask you if you did, and you STILL haven’t responded. Care to now?
two Tesla Cybertrucks worth more than $100,000
Doubt
Admit you dishonestly edited the Sanders clip.
There’s zero Bernie Sanders in it. You’re still not answering why you deceptively edited Sanders statements.
They should reply with only:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
I’m not seeing a correlation only argument here. Where would there be correlation without causation with what I’ve posted?
It took you more time to write your comment than it would have to listen to it.
It took you more time to find a video than to just say “yes I edited Sanders dishonestly”.
You being evasive and dishonest does not obligate me to play along. You were dishonest with your Sanders edit. I asked you why you were dishonest with your edit. Your explanation was more evasion.
If you have a position, you are doing the worst to represent it. Your track record on this is entirely dishonest. I can’t trust anything your saying.
The “give away” requires a request. I think Florida would simply like to look at everything private without having to ask.
You might be interested in OPs post history:
“I a m terrorist .” source
Note, I used the equal level of honesty and editing for this quote of OP as OP did of the Sanders video in this thead, so OP should be fine with it.
Texas decided that it wasn’t going to be subject to that, so it refused to connect its power grid to those of other state
Your information was correct for a long time but is now out-of-date. Texas is connecting to the national grids.
“ERCOT Power Grid Set To Connect To U.S. Grid: What The $360M Project Means For Texas And The Southeast” source
I turned the sound off and scanned through your linked video. No Sanders in any of that.
So YOU edited the Sanders video to create the false narrative? Do you have no shame?
Go watch the video I linked first.
Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?
I always thought the bigger miss of the common phrase is this: If “With great power comes great responsibility” then the converse must also be true “With NO POWER comes NO responsibility”. The level of responsibility must scale in direct proportion to the amount of power you have. If your boss is blaming you for something you have little to no control over, then it isn’t your responsibility, and you deserve no blame.
Your manager saying “You need to find someone to cover your shift” would then be bullshit. Unless you have the power to hire additional staff, allow for allowed time off for regular life events, or increase the pay of staff to make others more readily want to take the shift, I don’t see enough power for it to be your responsibility.
I’ve seen the same thing in some people over 60. The ones that don’t do this are the ones that continue to embrace new ideas, read, travel to experience other cultures, and learn/speak additional languages.
I don’t know if there is a magic formula to avoid the fate you’re describing. I’m doing what I’m seeing those that don’t fall into that trap do.