• 5 Posts
  • 4.37K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • There is legal obligation to honor the shelf tag if it says a product should be lower than what it rang up for.

    At the federal level (in the USA at least), there isn’t. Some states might, no law covering the entire nation.

    Otherwise it’s essentially a bait and switch, and can usually get a store in trouble if a customer complains to the right people.

    The legal barrier for “bait and switch” is higher than that. Bait and switch is if the price is intentionally lowered and advertised, then raised or not offered when the customer tries to buy. If a customer took one of these “expired shelf tag” situations to court, the retailer could easily point to their sale promo from the week before showing the price was valid at that time, but that the old shelf tag hadn’t been properly taken down. The retailer would win, but the retailer knows this too and the cost of legal representation, bad press, and losing a customer usually isn’t worth winning the legal argument, so they usually just honor the mistakenly lower price and move on.





  • Every 5 years go so I think about getting into powered paragliding. It looks amazing! Inevitably each time I find youtube videos talking about how much progress has occurred in the industry…and a heartfelt eulogy about a wildly experienced paraglider pilot that died recently while paragliding. I always turn away with the same thought: “If the very experienced people are dying like this, it is far riskier form me to try.”




  • Wether AI already contains hidden ads or not, it will be here before we can blink an eye.

    Its not hidden ads. Its likely lazy operating using the public internet for its training data scooping up ads already published elsewhere on the internet. I seriously doubt Facebook, Google, etc got paid to mention those unlicensed casinos after they were specifically prompted to return answers for unlicensed casinos by the article’s authors.

    Your rant has nothing to do with the article. Did you see “AI” and then just copy/paste a premade AI rant you had on hand? You’re stomping pretty hard on Rule #6 of this lemmy community.



  • I completely understand the retailer’s desire for electronic shelf tags, and it doesn’t have to be nefarious of the store taking advantage of customers.

    Way back in my youth when I worked retail, keeping shelf tags up-to-date was multiple-peoples full time jobs. This is was for a whole bunch of reasons.

    The obvious:

    • prices go up
    • prices go down

    The not so obvious:

    • new products come in that don’t have an existing tag so one needs to be created
    • products are out-of-stock and will not be replenished, so someone has to go to that shelf and pull that tag off
    • promotions have some stock moved from its normal shelf location to an end cap or otherwise special display in a store so more tags needed for the same amount of product
    • shelf space being utilized differently such as more product being oriented vertically where before it was horizontal so more tags needed for the same product
    • patrons steal shelf tags (who knows why), but it means a new tag must be printed and deployed to the shelf

    What’s more, if a shelf tag isn’t updated and the price rings up higher at the register, many retailers will honor the shelf tag listed price so there is a financial loss to the store from poorly maintained shelf tags. I am not surprised at all that it is cheaper for the retailer to buy and implement an entire electronic shelf tag solution over paper tags and labor.





  • Long story short I don’t feel like I deserve romance in my life yet. I feel like I got nothing to offer.

    Turn this perspective around. Assume you have a mate. Describe what things you like about them such as:

    Character

    • Do they offer help to people they know?
    • Do they offer help to people they don’t even know?
    • How do they treat people in service industries?
    • What charities do they support (if any)?
    • Do you think they have reasonable interactions with their family?
    • How honest are they with themselves when they make mistakes?
    • How do they treat the feelings of others?

    Finances/Employment/Career

    • Are they able to cover their bills?
    • Do they have a level of ambition with regards to their career that you respect?
    • What does their savings look like?

    Intelligence/Education

    • Do you feel they have completed sufficient schooling?
    • Can they handle difficult situations on their own or are they constantly reliant upon others to navigate adult life for them?

    …etc.

    Now, how do you stack up against your list of traits and values you want for your mate? Do you see any particular shortcomings in yourself? If so, that’s your list to work on and you can know you can offer your mate exactly what you are looking for from them.


  • We happened to be a drug store yesterday in the Easter candy aisle. We saw the bargain basement horrible candy maker “Palmer” with two different hollow candy rabbits.

    Palmer’s Parsnip Pete:

    Palmer’s Peter Rabbit:

    Both of these were side by side and marked at $8.99 each. It took me a bit to figure out why there would be two different candy rabbits from the same company, sold at the same price.

    Peter Rabbit is 5oz and is chocolate

    Parsnip Pete is 7oz and isn’t chocolate! - looking at the ingredients is all sugar and hydrogenated oils. Only a tiny bit of chocolate in it.

    Palmer is the worst chocolate I’ve ever run across. Even if I’m offered it for free I won’t eat it. I don’t consider it chocolate, and with their other lines of products (like Pete) that isn’t just a preference on my part but a provable fact.


  • I didn’t read the article, fwiw. EVs should be taxed.

    I’m already taxed on my EV at the state level. The article you didn’t read would add additional federal taxes. I’m not opposed to paying my fair share to maintain roads. The problem is these EV tax levels are WAY OVER the fair share for EV drivers.

    US infrastucture is paid for by taxes on fuel at the pump, so all EVs do is destroy roads.

    The problem is proportion. The EV, lets call them “road taxes”, are a static number, and that number is VERY HIGH.

    Lets assume the average car gets 30 miles/gallon. My current state EV tax is $200/year. The total fuel tax (state and federal) where I live is 38.5 cents/gallon. If we do the math EVs are paying the tax on the equivalent driving of 15,584 miles/year.

    The article you didn’t read talks about the GOP wanting to put an additional $250/year tax on EVs at the federal level. So using the same metrics as in the example before an EV would be paying the tax on the equivalent driving of 36,065 miles/year.

    To add insult to injury, I drive less than 9k miles a year.

    Because these are static taxes and not based on actual use, actual road damage, there’s nothing a consumer can change in behavior to lower the tax except to buy a gasoline car instead.

    This also says nothing to the argument that while, yes “all vehicles destroy roads”, a passenger vehicle does a tiny fraction of the damage of a giant 18-wheeler (HGV). While those big shipping trucks certainly use more fuel, they damage they do to roads far exceeds the tax they pay in fuel*.

    So again, I’m fine paying my fair share of road taxes, but the current and proposed additonal EV road taxes are disproportionally high compared to both gasoline vehicles and giant 18-wheeler trucks.

    Repeal the gas tax and tax the weight of the vehicle is a sane option. I am sure that isn’t what the oil-backed GOP wants, though.

    I’d be fine with that.

    However, my original reply stands. The GOP, in the face of high oil costs, are making EV adoption even harder.