I think there definitely are forms of protest that objectively just hurt any movement. A few people looting stores, setting random stuff on fire and most forms of violence will make the whole crowd appear violent and scare off the general public.

I do not agree with this. The George Floyd Uprising / protests started violent and it still became massive and actually dangerous to the status quo.

I think its possible to blame one group in this meme and another group in another meme.

Kinda true. Didnt some liberal democracies also turn (partially) anarchist or socialist?

Streaming sites are great to share the spirit of piracy with your friends that do not want to get into any other piracy option. Literally just sending them a link so they dont buy the movie on amazon is always worth it

but only as long as they output power.

We could say the same about nuclear power:

EDF cuts nuclear production in reaction to soaring temperatures

Similar discussion a while ago

This meme is from a movie based on the Kangoroo Chronicles books. Atleast the original german versions are quite funny

Anarchists have different goals than communists and use different means/strategies to achieve those goals while using different modes of organization. Just hating capitalism is not enough of a basis to just gloss over those things.

Apart from certain instances when the goals align like antifascist action, international solidarity or support of prisoners, why would working together / doing unity actually be beneficial to achieving anarchist goals?

But they’re awful at coordinating across wide areas, resisting infiltration, or leveraging economies of scale to expand industrial operations.

I would frame it differently. Anarchist organizing is harder than capitalist / centralized socialist organizing. Anarchist still do it because anarchists see it as worth while to try even if it means they might fail more often

I dont like this way of thinking because its the wromg way around. The very popular study believes, that non violent movements needed around 3% active participation to reach their goal. These movements did not set out with this number in mind.

Starting a movement with this specific number in mind will result in shortcuts that the movements in the study did not take.

Its like saying “healthy” people eat lots of vitamins and instead of doing all the stuff these people do/eat, you just take multivitamins and hope to have the same result.

It can work, but its a very one sided approach that leaves out so many other important aspects.

The goal should be taking down Trump before coming for the other party.

It should be, but I dont think that Democrats see it the same way. The party as a whole besides some individual politicians is not a party that is ready or willing to oppose the fascists.

They also have a track record of being useless against Trump. They were in power 4 years, Biden promised to bring the country back together and just failed. There is no need to focus on them when resisting Trumpism.

Doesnt mean they couldnt join the cause, but most likely they will do that when they decide to co-opt it so they can win the next election.

Schade. War sehr schön mal mit dem Nextbike zum See und/oder zurück.

Die Randbezirke tun mir nicht leid.

Auch dort leben sehr viele Menschen die gerne Fahrrad fahren und nicht die CDU/AfD gewählt haben.

blackblogs / noblogs host websites & provide urls for activist groups and campaigns. While in some cases Lemmy might be a better/equivalent alternative, often times its not.

Lemmy is just not as useful for campaigns and long lived activist groups, because the structure and all not needed features distract and make the user experience worse.

Besides this, both hosters have quite a history of hosting and not deleting radical content such as doxxed nazis and claims of responsiblity for militant actions, which is something many Lemmy instances do not have and some would probably deleted specific content based on their server rules.

As described by OOP, they just take parts out of context and think they somehow “won” the debate.

Probably by doing anarchism instead

Anarchists saved and improved countless lives in the last few years by doing direct action. They rescue(d) and support(ed) refugees, fed people all over the world, setup bail funds and so much more.

Actually impacting other peoples lives (and your oen) directly is a pretty appealing alternative imo.

Die Lösung wäre ein vollständiger Boykott des Gebäudes durch alle Kulturtreibenden, bis der Eigentümer es mit Verlust verkaufen muss. Und eine gute Veranstaltung lebt von den Leuten, die sie machen, nicht davon dass im selben Haus schon mal irgendwer anderes aufgetreten ist.

Ich glaube für diese Lösung benötigt es aber auch eine ordentliche Solidarität mit den dort angestellten Menschen.

WHY IS YOUR TITLE ALL LOWERCASE?

Also the other way around. If you do anti capitalism the right way(there infinite right ways, but imo all of them contain queer liberation) you have to think about queer liberation because so many people oppressed by capitalism are queer.