If it had as many 2 minute long tutorials on youtube explaining exactly the feature I was looking for as F360 does, FreeCAD would be the best case software

The way I heard it, the egg came first, it just wasn’t a chicken egg

https://www.cbr.com/just-how-many-pokmon-are-there-really/

Between original Pokemon, shinies, regional versions, and weird upgrades like gigantamax or whatever

You never know, they might bring it back permanently if they see their playerbase quintuple overnight

Ah shit, guess I’m getting back into overwatch

Some of them are extremely similar, but there were over 3,000 existing Pokemon designs as of Palworld’s release. It would be a statistical wonder if none of them looked similar, especially when our criteria can be as loose as “fire fox” and “Anubis”

at least make an attempt to understand it lol

That’s what I’m trying to do, and the best you can manage to explain to me is “actually you’re wrong.” You have time to type out three paragraphs, but not enough time to explain that the patents the page links to, despite being apparently (as far as I can discern) filed with the Japanese patent office, are not Japanese patents?

I admit I don’t really know what I’m talking about. The patent system is obtuse and virtually impossible to understand. But as far as I can tell, the patents referred to by the article are patents that were filed with the Japanese office. Can you explain what I’m getting wrong?

You quite literally linked info showing the dates of the US patents that are after the release of palworld.

I’m aware of that. The person you were responding to said “Look at the actual patents, though. They list 2021 as the application date in Japan.” Do you want to explain why the website apparently shows an initial application date of 2021 in Japan? Maybe the google patents page is misleading. Maybe it’s showing a related but not equivalent patent.

I really don’t care about the process or validity of suing, nor do I care about the actual application date. I just want to know why it looks a lot like the patents the site links to are Japanese patents, and you’re insisting that they’re not.

What do the dates in them have to do with you getting that basic piece of information wrong? If you have a point to make, make it.

In the sense that it only works in fiction

All 17 of the American women participating in this movement downvoted you

No, and the fact that we have to explain this every time someone talks about it is why I hate the phrase “toxic masculinity”

“Toxic masculinity” doesn’t mean all masculinity is toxic any more than “rotten fruit” means all fruit is rotten

I feel like you can do exactly that when the women we’re talking about actively attempt to get men sexually frustrated

Like, that’s the goal of this movement, no matter how Lemmy users try to co-opt it as something else. If you’re avoiding sex with men as a preventative protective measure, more power to you

I didn’t say I’d buy it right now lol

Oh damn, I just checked and found a massive hole on every physical disc I own…

Why are you lying? The article links to a google patents page, under the Japanese patents. There are US versions of these patents available to view, which the article didn’t link to.

JP7545191 is a japanese patent. You can click one of the little blue US buttons to see the American equivalent. The same is true of the other two patents in question

Japan is such a weird place that I wouldn’t be surprised if it works

That “Palworld vs Pokemon comparison” thing has to be a joke, right? “These two creatures look similar, so obviously one of them is a blatant ripoff” and “these two creatures don’t look similar, but obviously one of them is a blatant ripoff” lmao

Gonna buy another copy of Palworld just to spite Wesley Yin-Poole and Nintendo

And yet the only campaign ads I ever saw from her were clips of Donald Trump saying stupid shit.

I voted harris, but I don’t blame anyone for thinking that a Harris win would be a repeat of the last four years

I think I saw one headline about potentially trying to talk about eventually raising the minimum wage, once

All this talk we’re hearing about all of these states shifting right is a little bit misleading. It’s not that anyone who voted Biden in 2020 switched their vote to Trump in '24, it’s that a lot of Biden’s voters in 2020 didn’t vote at all this year, while most of Trump’s did