• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • Sharing your opinion is not the same as sharing your art.

    I agree that monetisation as a standard probably isn’t ideal, but I think you’re fooling yourself if you think a lot of the artists and musicians here aren’t posting with some intent to drive you to their monetised content. Social media is a great place for artists to promote their work in general.

    I thought the whole point of the fedi was to encourage open social media. If you don’t want to see artists or monetised content, you can block those creators or instances. The fedi isn’t subject to your preferences or mine, after all. I’m sorry, but I don’t think you get to decide what does and doesn’t happen here.

    The thing is, monetisation wouldn’t even work the same way here because there is no algorithm, so it’s not like you’d get (as) many people trying to create rage bait to game the algorithm.

    Your initial post came across as if you begrudge any creators or artists making any money from what they post here. If I misinterpreted your position then my bad, and I don’t want enshitification either (although given the decentralised framework of the fedi, I’m not sure how that could even happen in the traditional sense).



  • I bet you’ll find that some do have patrons or subs or something similar.

    If people want to share their work for free, that’s cool. If people want to charge for their work, that’s also cool.

    The fact is, being good at something creative takes the same time and dedication as anything else, but because it’s entertainment or art people expect it for free ‘because it’s a passion’.

    Should doctors passionate about medicine not get paid either?

    The fact is if you want a rich culture full of awesome art, the people creating that art need to be fucking paid.

    I’m not necessarily in support of monetising the fediverse or anything like that, but I also don’t begrudge anyone creative trying to actually get paid fairly for their work and time.


  • I agree. Lemmy isn’t as progressive as it thinks it is generally. Just like other social platforms, the concept of a nuanced discussion is mostly (not always) an alien one.

    People want things split neatly into ‘good’ and ‘bad’ or ‘us’ and ‘them’ and melt down when anything challenges those neat little boxes. We all do it to some degree, and I get the appeal of it.

    But if we want things to ever really get better, we need to be able to have better discussions about important issues and accept things are very rarely binary.

    Placing Kamala or Walz on some pedestal as if they’re perfect is just as blind as doing so for Trump.

    I’m not in the US, and yes I would vote for Kamala, but I think it’s important to be aware they are not perfect and the fight for a better society/world won’t be over if they win.