Deadnaming her would be calling her “Chris Cocker” and ignoring her new name. They are just saying what her identity was before she became Cara Cunningham. Makes it easier to understand the story.
Deadnaming her would be calling her “Chris Cocker” and ignoring her new name. They are just saying what her identity was before she became Cara Cunningham. Makes it easier to understand the story.
The fact that they didn’t even try to hide their ssid (or at least, the report doesn’t say they did) shows how stupid people can be with cybersecurity.
We need a kind of everybody union.
In a democracy, that’s called a government.
Quite the contrary. An uneducated population is easier to fool and to control. And uneducated != unemployable.
I know I’m just a big nerd 😆
Apparently, in this case it didn’t take long.
You don’t need " == True"
except if it’s the name of a variable that’s not boolean, in which case it wouldn’t make sense to name it “True”.
-1
One day I called out a cop for this in my hometown. His explanation was that if they get an emergency call when they’re inside, they don’t waste time getting back to their car.
It sounded like a sensible explanation.
Wait, I’m not sure I understand correctly… How is a CTV News article credited to Reuters an advertisement for Ground News?
Remember 2016. Everybody thought he would lose, said his campaign was a train wreck… He’s saying the same shit that got him elected last time.
So I wouldn’t say it’s unraveling. This is the kind of campaign that can make him win.
It’s Philippe Katerine, I’m surprised he kept his undies until the end.
Right now, France doesn’t.
Left wing parties made an alliance to defeat the RN but they didn’t get the majority, and Macron is trying to find a way to designate a PM from the center
The only way this happens is through strong policy on tax havens, fair wealth redistribution and making it easy for workers to unionize.
The only way to make this kind of policy come to life is to get money out of politics as much as possible: hard limits on campaign funds and contributions. Having more money than you opponents shouldn’t give you an advantage.
Yeah every store values client loyalty, but pretending companies (e.g. Walmart for crissakes) want to be loyal to their customers should disqualify you from being called an “industry analyst”.
The Lawyers: “Noooo Mr. Musk, don’t sign those!”
Elon: “Fuck it man, I’m buying Twitter, yolo”
I think the most interesting thing in this article is the fact that some concepts central to semantics (analogy, connotation) or psychology (bias) kind of emerge naturally in multi layered neural networks of sufficient size. Also that it can sound like different personalities (overconfident, secretive, delusional) if you manipulate the weight or the proximity of features. I’d like to see the same kind of study but for midjourney…
You are either ignorant or trolling, and in any case you bring no argument to this discussion.
I dunno, what do you think about this whole thing?
Oh you sweet, summer child.